Evaluating the Efficacy of a Low-Impact Delivery System for In Situ Treatment of Sediments Contaminated with Methylmercury and Other Hydrophobic Chemicals

dc.contributor.authorMenzie, Charles
dc.contributor.authorAmos, Bennett
dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, Susan Kane
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Upal
dc.contributor.authorGilmour, Cynthia
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-09T17:54:32Z
dc.date.issued2015-9-26
dc.description.abstractThis report describes field demonstrations of in situ treatment of PCBs and mercury with activated carbon (AC) delivered using the SediMite® delivery system. The project involved two sites within Canal Creek at the Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) in Edgewood, Maryland, that are contaminated with mercury and PCBs. The application of SediMite® to a third site—Bailey Creek at Fort Eustis in Virginia—is also described for comparison. Data are also included for a fourth site at which SediMite® was used to treat PCBs within a Phragmites marsh. The sites represent different types of habitats, and the synoptic evaluation provides insights into the performance of SediMite® as a delivery system for in situ treatment with AC across a range of biological and physical conditions. The demonstration projects showed that treatment of PCBs can be carried out in the field using AC delivered via SediMite® . The bioavailability of PCBs was typically reduced by >80% across these sites, with values >90% being achievable. Treatment was also demonstrated for DDx. Efficacy was related to the presence of target doses of activated carbon. Results were equivocal for treatment of mercury. Because most performance metrics for bioavailability rely on laboratory measures of field-collected samples, there is some uncertainty regarding extrapolation to the field. Effects of treatment on native biota were judged to be negligible. This remedial option falls within a range of costs for other remedial alternatives.
dc.description.sponsorshipSPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP) Alexandria, VA
dc.description.urihttps://serdp-estcp.mil/projects/details/1ccf71e6-22f1-49e0-83f3-acdd8f684e24
dc.format.extent122 pages
dc.genre technical reports
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2blb1-a5pv
dc.identifier.citationMenzie, Charles, Bennett Amos, Susan Kane Driscoll, Upal Ghosh, and Cynthia Gilmour. “Evaluating the Efficacy of a Low-Impact Delivery System for In Situ Treatment of Sediments Contaminated with Methylmercury and Other Hydrophobic Chemicals,” July 2, 2010. https://serdp-estcp.mil/projects/details/1ccf71e6-22f1-49e0-83f3-acdd8f684e24.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/39166
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherESTCP
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Chemical, Biochemical & Environmental Engineering Department
dc.rightsThis is a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rightsPublic Domain
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
dc.subjectwetland/marsh environments
dc.subjectsediment contamination with activated carbon (AC)
dc.subjectin-situ treatment
dc.subjectEnvironmental Restoration Project
dc.titleEvaluating the Efficacy of a Low-Impact Delivery System for In Situ Treatment of Sediments Contaminated with Methylmercury and Other Hydrophobic Chemicals
dc.typeText

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Final_Report_ER200835_February_2016.pdf
Size:
4.99 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ER-200835-CP.pdf
Size:
642.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format