Exploring fairness in participatory thermal comfort control in smart buildings

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Shin, Eun-Jeong, Roberto Yus, Sharad Mehrotra, and Nalini Venkatasubramanian. “Exploring Fairness in Participatory Thermal Comfort Control in Smart Buildings.” In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Built Environments, 1–10. BuildSys ’17. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137133.3137156.

Rights

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from permissions@acm.org.

Subjects

Abstract

Current buildings rely on predefined rules to control the temperature in rooms disregarding their residents' thermal comfort. Multiple approaches have been presented in the literature to tackle this issue (e.g., by enabling occupants to express their feedback using their mobile devices). In general setting, to reach consensus among group members, we apply decision making methods (e.g., majority, mean, trimmed mean, and median) to aggregate the diverse expected comfort levels of the inhabitants. However, such methods might be unfair to some participants. In this paper, we present the first study of the issue of fairness in participatory thermal comfort control. Inspired by the traditional definitions in scheduling, we introduce a definition of fairness that is suitably adapted to the particularities of our scenario. We then present our design of an aggregation method that ensures fairness. Finally, we show how our algorithm behaves compared with traditional aggregation methods in diverse simulated scenarios.