Evaluating mechanisms of proactive facilitation in cued recall

dc.contributor.authorAue, William R.
dc.contributor.authorCriss, Amy H.
dc.contributor.authorNovak, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-13T20:14:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01
dc.description.abstractConfusion of older information with newer, similar information is a potent source of memory errors. The current project focused on understanding how memories for recent experiences interact, or interfere, with other related information. In the experiments, participants study multiple lists of pairs of items. Items from an initial study list (e.g., A-B) reappear on a second study list paired with new, other items (e.g., A-Br). Memory performance for A-Br pairs is contrasted with control pairs exclusive to the second study list (e.g., C-D). We observed that the correct recall of the second presentation of a target (Br) is better when cued by its partner (A) despite being studied with a different partner during the initial presentation; a phenomena called proactive facilitation. We examined multiple possible explanations for proactive facilitation, including whether proactive facilitation was driven by changes in response threshold, whether participants encoded the pairs with repeated items and associations better during the second study list, or whether participants spent more time searching memory for A-Br pairs. In general, the data appear to be most consistent with the idea that some items, when encountered a second time, are encoded more completely while others are not. Implications for models of memory are discussed.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number (#0951612) awarded to AHC. MDN is now at the Department of Applied Behavioral Science at the University of Kansas. Data and materials can be accessed through the Open Science Framework: url to be specified later.
dc.description.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X16301565
dc.format.extent59 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.genrepostprints
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2srmx-rosn
dc.identifier.citationAue, William R., Amy H. Criss, and Matthew D. Novak. “Evaluating Mechanisms of Proactive Facilitation in Cued Recall.” Journal of Memory and Language 94 (June 2017): 103–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.004.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/39753
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Psychology Department
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en
dc.subjectAssociative memory
dc.subjectProactive facilitation
dc.subjectEpisodic memory
dc.subjectCued recall
dc.subjectList discrimination
dc.subjectMemory models
dc.titleEvaluating mechanisms of proactive facilitation in cued recall
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2889-2819

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1s2.0S0749596X16301565am.pdf
Size:
1.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format