Comparisons of techniques for measuring shortwave absorption and black carbon content of aerosols from biomass burning in Brazil

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Reid, Jeffrey S., Peter V. Hobbs, Catherine Liousse, J. Vanderlei Martins, Ray E. Weiss, and Thomas F. Eck. “Comparisons of Techniques for Measuring Shortwave Absorption and Black Carbon Content of Aerosols from Biomass Burning in Brazil.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 103, no. D24 (1998): 32031–40. https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00773.

Rights

This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain

Subjects

Abstract

Six methods for measuring the shortwave absorption and/or black carbon (BC) content of aerosols from biomass burning were compared during the Smoke, Clouds, and Radiation-Brazil (SCAR-B) experiment. The methods were the optical extinction cell (OEC), integrating plate (IP), optical reflectance (OR), particle soot/absorption photometer (PSAP), thermal evolution (TE), and remote sensing (RS). Comparisons were made for individual smoke plumes and for regional hazes dominated by smoke. Taking the OEC as a primary standard, measurements of the absorption coefficient (σₐ) showed that the OR method had the lowest uncertainty (17%) in σₐ. The other optical methods had uncertainties ranging from 20 to 40%. However, with sufficient sample size, the values of σₐ derived from the optical methods converged to within 20% of each other. For biomass burning aerosols in regional hazes over Brazil, this led to systematic differences of ±0.02 in the values of the single-scattering albedo derived from the various in situ techniques. It was found also that the BC content of the aerosol and σₐ were poorly correlated. This is likely due to a large uncertainty in the BC content of the aerosol measured by TE, and/or a high variability in the mass absorption efficiency of BC in biomass burning aerosol. Hence there is a high uncertainty in inferring σₐ from the BC content of smoke aerosol.