Impact of Intervention Strategies on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

dc.contributor.authorKoyratty, Nadia
dc.contributor.authorAzupogo, Fusta
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Taryn J.
dc.contributor.authorHinnouho, Guy-Marino
dc.contributor.authorTharaney, Manisha
dc.contributor.authorBliznashka, Lilia
dc.contributor.authorOlney, Deanna K.
dc.contributor.authorHess, Sonja Y
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-30T19:22:18Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-15
dc.description.abstractBackground Despite well-documented health benefits, fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake remains below recommended levels globally. Objectives This scoping review aimed to identify effective intervention strategies to increase F&V intake. Methods We searched PubMed and Web of Science (February 2023) for intervention studies assessing impact on F&V intake. Eligibility criteria included studies published in English since 2012, a valid control group, ≥2 weeks duration, and ≥50 participants per intervention arm. Analysis was done by intervention comparison. Findings were described by summarizing proportion of intervention comparisons reporting statistically significant increases in fruit, vegetable and/or combined F&V intake across standalone (nutrition communication, social protection, agriculture or food environment restructuring) and multi-component strategies. Results A total of 284 intervention comparisons (223 unique studies) were included. The majority of comparisons (191/284) came from high-income countries (HICs) and 93/284 from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Nutrition communication was the most common standalone strategy, with 121/218 comparisons reporting positive impacts on fruit, vegetable and/or combined F&V intake. Fewer studies evaluated standalone social protection (13/284), food environment restructuring (4/284), or agriculture strategies (3/284). Among the limited interventions, 7/13 social protection and 3/4 food environment restructuring comparisons reported positive impacts, while none of the three standalone agricultural interventions did. Multi-component interventions demonstrated potential with 28/46 comparisons having positive impacts. Conclusions Some of the intervention strategies showed potential for increasing fruit and/or vegetable intake. However, given the heterogeneity of the interventions, small number of studies for some strategies and limited evidence from LMICs, more rigorous, context-specific research is needed.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe FRESH Initiative is being implemented by CGIAR researchers from IFPRI, CIMMYT, The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, IWMI, and CIP in close partnership with the World Vegetable Center, Applied Horticultural Research, the University of Sydney, the Institute of Development Studies, Wageningen University & Research, the University of California, Davis, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, and the Philippines Department of Science and Technology-Food and Nutrition Research Institute, along with other partners. We would like to thank all funders who support this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund: www.cgiar. org/funders.
dc.description.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03795721251350208
dc.format.extent16 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2yw0z-qjd7
dc.identifier.citationKoyratty, Nadia, Fusta Azupogo, Taryn J. Smith, et al. “Impact of Intervention Strategies on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.” Food and Nutrition Bulletin, SAGE Publications Inc, July 15, 2025, 03795721251350208. https://doi.org/10.1177/03795721251350208.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/03795721251350208
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/39524
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSage
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Emergency and Distaster Health Systems
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectUMBC Disaster Health Research Lab
dc.titleImpact of Intervention Strategies on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6035-6920
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4661-277X

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
koyrattyetal2025impactofinterventionstrategiesonfruitandvegetableintakeinlowmiddleandhighincome.pdf
Size:
1.28 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
sjxlsx2fnb10.1177_03795721251350208.zip
Size:
1.58 MB
Format:
Unknown data format