Effect of measurement conditions on sound scattered from a pyramid diffuser in a free field

dc.contributor.authorRiegel, Kimberly A.
dc.contributor.authorBradley, David T.
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Mallory
dc.contributor.authorNasipak, Zachary
dc.contributor.authorKowalok, Ian
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-28T16:10:48Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-17
dc.description168th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, 27–31 October 2014, Indianapolis, Indiana
dc.description.abstractA surface with a non-planar geometry, referred to as a diffuser, can be used in acoustically sensitive spaces to help control or eliminate unwanted effects from strong reflections by scattering the reflected sound. The scattering behavior of a diffuser can be measured in a free field, according to the standard ISO 17497-2. Many of the measurement conditions discussed in this standard can have an effect on the measured data; however, these conditions are often not well-specified and/or have not been substantiated. In the current study, a pyramid diffuser has been measured while varying four measurement setup parameters: surface absorption coefficient, surface perimeter shape, surface vertical mounting location, and surface pattern orientation. Reflected polar response data have been measured, analyzed, and compared for various conditions of each parameter. The absorption coefficient showed the most significant difference in the polar response plots. The vertical mounting location produced some variation in the data, with the average mounting height location shown as the optimal setting. The surface perimeter shape shows no variation in the polar plots. The surface pattern orientation also showed almost no difference in the measured data.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1055268. Additional support was provided by Vassar College. Thank you to Scott Crawford at LMN Tech Studio, the integrated design technology studio at LMN Architects, for the construction of the MDF surfaces. Also, thank you to the Vassar College undergraduate students who assisted with this project in addition to those listed as co-authors on this paper, including Jacob Adelgren, Ariana Sharma, Tyler Martinez, and Andrew Terenzi. Additionally, the authors would like to express their deepest gratitude to Dr. Matthew Nobile, Robert Boyes, and Seth Bard for their assistance and the use of their anechoic chamber at the IBM Hudson Valley Acoustics Laboratory.
dc.description.urihttps://pubs.aip.org/asa/poma/article/22/1/015003/994889/Effect-of-measurement-conditions-on-sound
dc.format.extent14 pages
dc.genreconference papers and proceedings
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2labu-60up
dc.identifier.citationRiegel, Kimberly A., David T. Bradley, Mallory Morgan, Zachary Nasipak, and Ian Kowalok. “Effect of Measurement Conditions on Sound Scattered from a Pyramid Diffuser in a Free Field.” Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 22, no. 1 (2016): 015003. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000235.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000235
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/40041
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAIP
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Center for Space Sciences and Technology (CSST) / Center for Research and Exploration in Space Sciences & Technology II (CRSST II)
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rightsPublic Domain
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
dc.subjectReflected polar response data
dc.subjectnon-planar geometry
dc.subjectacoustically sensitive spaces
dc.titleEffect of measurement conditions on sound scattered from a pyramid diffuser in a free field
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5109-9704

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pma.v22.i1.015003_1.online.pdf
Size:
3.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format