Assessing the ramifications of climate change for the purpose of modeling streamflow within the Upper Merced basin in California: 1984-2099

dc.contributor.advisorFath, Brian D.
dc.contributor.authorCole, Megan B.
dc.contributor.programTowson University. Environmental Science and Studies Programen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-09T21:44:52Z
dc.date.available2018-02-09T21:44:52Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-09
dc.date.submitted2017-12
dc.description(M.S.) -- Towson University, 2017en_US
dc.description.abstractHydrological responses within the Upper Merced Basin of California to future climate variations were assessed over a continuous 60-yr period. Using a calibrated SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) basin model, future monthly peak flow and streamflow discharge sensitivity was tested under climate schemes from 2040-2099. Two general circulation models (GCMs) utilized in this study, the Met Office Hadley Centre Model 2 -- Carbon Cycle (HadGEM2-CC) and The National Center for Atmospheric Research (CCSM4), were inputted into the Upper Merced SWAT model under IPCC forcing scenarios RCP 6.5 and 8.0. Probabilities of discharge peaks were determined using the respective climate model's temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation. Results indicate that times of projected peak flow may occur one to three months earlier than the studied historical time period (1984-2013). Under the historical observed time period of 1984-2007, average Upper Merced peak flow occurred most often in May (22%) and April (20%) (Figure 6.4). Under future climate scenarios tested from 2040-2099, streamflow peak flow shifted to earlier in the winter/spring seasons. HadGem2-CC RCP6.0 scenario shows peak flow most likely occurring in January (33.8%) and February (35.6%). During the same time period under CCSM4, peak flow is shown to occur during December (33.8%) and February (23.7%). HadGem2-CC RCP 8.5 peak flow stretches across January (27.1%), December (22%), and February (22%), while CCSM4 RCP 8.5 similarly shows peak flow shared between January (28.8%), February (25.4%), and December (27.1%). Modeled future streamflows exhibit high relative sensitivities to temperature and precipitation change due to warming conditions. These findings in collaboration with Upper Merced basin characteristics of high elevation, low groundwater influence, and late season snowmelt, indicate high hydrological sensitivity to snowpack reduction. Results underscore the importance of a flexible management style for water resources dependent on snowpack. Increased and thorough climate monitoring is necessary to assess climate impacts within vulnerable high-elevation mountainous regions.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://library.towson.edu/digital/collection/etd/id/63548en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format.extentxii, 121 pagesen_US
dc.genrethesesen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/M2TT4FV6C
dc.identifier.otherTF2017Cole
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/7775
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtTowson University
dc.titleAssessing the ramifications of climate change for the purpose of modeling streamflow within the Upper Merced basin in California: 1984-2099en_US
dc.title.alternativeAssessing the ramifications of climate change for the purpose of modeling streamflow within the Upper Merced Basin, California using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT), 1984-2099en_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
TF2017Cole_Redacted.pdf
Size:
2.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Cole Thesis

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.45 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: