Relationship between methane flux and carbon uptake in three cosmopolitan wetland plant genera
dc.contributor.author | Villa, J.A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stephen, T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Rey-Sanchez, A.C | |
dc.contributor.author | Bohrer, G | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-20T20:21:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-12-20T20:21:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-11-16 | |
dc.description.abstract | Wetlands are the most important natural source of methane (CH₄) to the atmosphere. When present, plant efflux is often the dominant pathway for methane emissions from the anoxic wetland sediments, however, they are rarely considered in chamber measurement campaigns of CH₄ flux in wetlands. While studies have focused on the mechanisms that govern transport through plant structures, none have addressed how CH₄ emissions relate with carbon uptake or how this relationship may vary among plants. Understanding this relationship has important implications for linking carbon flux at the ecosystem level to wetland CH₄ emission predictions, and ultimately, to help improve current carbon budget and greenhouse gas models of wetlands. This study presents simultaneous measurements of CH₄ and CO₂ fluxes in three macrophyte species of different cosmopolitan genera: Typha (emergent), Nelumbo, and Nymphaea (floating attached). These measurements were conducted using the Picarro GasScouter G₄301 fitted with custom-designed leaf chambers. Chamber measurements were performed three times during a day (morning, noon and afternoon), in three separate months. Results indicate significant negative correlations between CH₄ flux and carbon uptake in Nelumbo and Nymphaea species and a non-significant positive correlation in Typha sp. We term the rate of CH₄ flux per unit CO₂ uptake – CH₄ flux efficiency. We found that in Nymphaea CH₄ flux efficiency is almost double that of Nelumbo. These results suggest the dependence of CH₄ efflux in stomatal conductance in the floating attached macrophytes, while in the Typha CH₄ flux is primarily through other pores, probably aerenchyma, not regulated by stomata. Our results emphasize the importance of species-specific knowledge and considering the growth type of different wetland macrophytes (e.g. emergent vs floating attached) in scaling of bottom-up observations and ecosystem models. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://d197for5662m48.cloudfront.net/documents/publicationstatus/94106/preprint_pdf/3baa8034a9f0f8743981fa8543e809ec.pdf | en_US |
dc.genre | posters | en_US |
dc.identifier | doi:10.13016/m2npdk-2hyu | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11603/26476 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Chemical, Biochemical & Environmental Engineering Department Collection | |
dc.rights | This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author. | en_US |
dc.title | Relationship between methane flux and carbon uptake in three cosmopolitan wetland plant genera | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |