Price elasticity of demand for buprenorphine/naloxone prescriptions
Collections
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
McClellan, Chandler et al.; Price elasticity of demand for buprenorphine/naloxone prescriptions; Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Volume 106, Pages 4-11, 9 August, 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2019.08.001
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Subjects
Abstract
Although there have been supply-side efforts in response to the opioid crisis (e.g., prescription drug monitoring programs), little information exists on demand-side approaches related to patient cost sharing that may affect utilization of and adherence to pharmacotherapy by individuals with opioid use disorder. Among individuals who had initiated pharmacotherapy, we estimated the price elasticity of demand of prescription fills of buprenorphine/naloxone, a common pharmacotherapy drug, overall and by patient characteristics. Using the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database for individuals with employer-sponsored private health insurance coverage, we examined the relationship between cost sharing and the number of buprenorphine/naloxone prescription fills using enrollee-level longitudinal fixed effects models. Cost sharing was expressed as a price index for each employer-plan. By including enrollee-level fixed effects, the identification of the effect of interest comes from longitudinal variation in prices across multiple time points for each enrollee. Overall, the demand for buprenorphine/naloxone was price inelastic (p = 0.191). However, some subgroups were responsive to price. A doubling of price was associated with a decrease in fills by 3.0% for enrollees aged 45–64 years (p = 0.029); 5.7% for those in rural areas (p = 0.033); 5.8% for residents of the South (p ≤0.001); and 3.0% for those enrolled in an HMO (p = 0.004). Insurers should consider the effects on these groups before increasing beneficiary out-of-pocket costs for pharmacotherapy and efforts to increase adherence should consider that price may be a barrier for some subgroups with OUD.