Propagation of radiosonde pressure sensor errors to ozonesonde measurements

dc.contributor.authorStauffer, R. M.
dc.contributor.authorMorris, G. A.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Anne M.
dc.contributor.authorJoseph, E.
dc.contributor.authorCoetzee, G. J. R.
dc.contributor.authorNalli, N. R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-20T17:31:34Z
dc.date.available2024-06-20T17:31:34Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-10
dc.description.abstractSeveral previous studies highlight pressure (or equivalently, pressure altitude) discrepancies between the radiosonde pressure sensor and that derived from a GPS flown with the radiosonde. The offsets vary during the ascent both in absolute and percent pressure differences. To investigate this problem further, a total of 731 radiosonde/ozonesonde launches from the Southern Hemisphere subtropics to northern mid-latitudes are considered, with launches between 2005 and 2013 from both longer term and campaign-based intensive stations. Five series of radiosondes from two manufacturers (International Met Systems: iMet, iMet-P, iMet-S, and Vaisala: RS80-15N and RS92-SGP) are analyzed to determine the magnitude of the pressure offset. Additionally, electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozonesondes from three manufacturers (Science Pump Corporation; SPC and ENSCI/Droplet Measurement Technologies; DMT) are analyzed to quantify the effects these offsets have on the calculation of ECC ozone (O₃) mixing ratio profiles (O₃ₘᵣ) from the ozonesonde-measured partial pressure. Approximately half of all offsets are > ±0.6 hPa in the free troposphere, with nearly a third > ±1.0 hPa at 26 km, where the 1.0 hPa error represents ~ 5% of the total atmospheric pressure. Pressure offsets have negligible effects on O₃ₘᵣ below 20 km (96% of launches lie within ±5% O₃ₘᵣ error at 20 km). Ozone mixing ratio errors above 10 hPa (~ 30 km), can approach greater than ±10% (> 25% of launches that reach 30 km exceed this threshold). These errors cause disagreement between the integrated ozonesonde-only column O₃ from the GPS and radiosonde pressure profile by an average of +6.5 DU. Comparisons of total column O₃ between the GPS and radiosonde pressure profiles yield average differences of +1.1 DU when the O₃ is integrated to burst with addition of the McPeters and Labow (2012) above-burst O₃ column climatology. Total column differences are reduced to an average of −0.5 DU when the O₃ profile is integrated to 10 hPa with subsequent addition of the O₃ climatology above 10 hPa. The RS92 radiosondes are superior in performance compared to other radiosondes, with average 26 km errors of −0.12 hPa or +0.61% O₃ₘᵣ error. iMet-P radiosondes had average 26 km errors of −1.95 hPa or +8.75 % O₃ₘᵣ error. Based on our analysis, we suggest that ozonesondes always be coupled with a GPS-enabled radiosonde and that pressure-dependent variables, such as O₃ₘᵣ, be recalculated/reprocessed using the GPS-measured altitude, especially when 26 km pressure offsets exceed ±1.0 hPa/±5%.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by grants NNX09AJ236 (SHADOZ), NNX10AR39G (DISCOVERAQ), and NNX12AF056 to Penn State University with additional support to Anne Thompson from the US–South Africa Fulbright Scholar Program (2010–2011). Funding for Gary Morris was provided by a Fulbright Scholar Grant from the Japan–US. Educational Commission, NASA’s Division of Earth Science Aura Data Validation Program (D. Considine and E. Hilsenrath, program managers), INTEX-B Mission, and TC4 Mission, and the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality. Original identification and analysis work for this problem began with Elizabeth Thompson at Valparaiso. Special thanks to hosts in Japan during Gary Morris’ Fulbright: Jun Hirokawa and Fumio Hasebe (Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan) and Hajime Akimoto (Frontier Research Center for Global Change, Yokohama, Japan). Thanks also to Barry Lefer at University of Houston (Houston, TX) and Bob Heinemann at the Oklahoma State University Kiamichi Forestry Research Station (Idabel, OK) and to the many students who have been involved in the ozonesonde launches from the various sites over the years. Access to Beltsville data was facilitated by Cassie Stearns at the Howard University Beltsville Center for Climate Studies and Observation. Thanks to Frederick Clowney and Joe Barnes at International Met Systems for additional information and assistance. The authors would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers as well as M. Shiotani, Y. Inai, M. Fujiwara and F. Hasebe for comments which greatly improved this manuscript.
dc.description.urihttps://amt.copernicus.org/articles/7/65/2014/
dc.format.extent15 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m28rng-jntm
dc.identifier.citationStauffer, R. M., G. A. Morris, A. M. Thompson, E. Joseph, G. J. R. Coetzee, and N. R. Nalli. “Propagation of Radiosonde Pressure Sensor Errors to Ozonesonde Measurements.” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 7, no. 1 (January 10, 2014): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-65-2014.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-65-2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/34670
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEGU
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC GESTAR II
dc.rightsCC BY 3.0 DEED Attribution 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.titlePropagation of radiosonde pressure sensor errors to ozonesonde measurements
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7829-0920

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
amt7652014.pdf
Size:
4.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections