Queer NLP: A Critical Survey on Literature Gaps, Biases and Trends

dc.contributor.authorWeber, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorWang, Angelina
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Ankush
dc.contributor.authorSubramonian, Arjun
dc.contributor.authorUlmer, Dennis
dc.contributor.authorTanwar, Eshaan
dc.contributor.authorAich, Geetanjali
dc.contributor.authorDevinney, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, Jacob
dc.contributor.authorMickel, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorTint, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorSosto, Mae
dc.contributor.authorGroshan, Ray
dc.contributor.authorAstarita, Simone
dc.contributor.authorGautam, Vagrant
dc.contributor.authorBlaschke, Verena
dc.contributor.authorAgnew, William
dc.contributor.authorLee, Wilson Y.
dc.contributor.authorLong, Yanan
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-26T14:26:26Z
dc.date.issued2026-02-18
dc.description.abstractNatural language processing (NLP) technologies are rapidly reshaping how language is created, processed, and analyzed by humans. With current and potential applications in hiring, law, healthcare, and other areas that impact people's lives, understanding and mitigating harms towards marginalized groups is critical. In this survey, we examine NLP research papers that explicitly address the relationship between LGBTQIA+ communities and NLP technologies. We systematically review all such papers published in the ACL Anthology, to answer the following research questions: (1) What are current research trends? (2) What gaps exist in terms of topics and methods? (3) What areas are open for future work? We find that while the number of papers on queer NLP has grown within the last few years, most papers take a reactive rather than a proactive approach, pointing out bias more often than mitigating it, and focusing on shortcomings of existing systems rather than creating new solutions. Our survey uncovers many opportunities for future work, especially regarding stakeholder involvement, intersectionality, interdisciplinarity, and languages other than English. We also offer an outlook from a queer studies perspective, highlighting understudied topics and gaps in the harms addressed in NLP papers. Beyond being a roadmap of what has been done, this survey is a call to action for work towards more just and inclusive NLP technologies.
dc.description.urihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16151
dc.format.extent24 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.genrepreprints
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2bxzi-y4kb
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.16151
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/42233
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Student Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en
dc.subjectComputer Science - Computers and Society
dc.subjectUMBC Language, Aid, and Representation AI (LARA) Lab
dc.titleQueer NLP: A Critical Survey on Literature Gaps, Biases and Trends
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-9712-1256

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2602.16151v3.pdf
Size:
898.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format