A Suzaku X-ray observation of one orbit of the supergiant fast X-ray transient IGR J16479−4514

Abstract

We report on a 250 ks long X-ray observation of the supergiant fast X-ray transient IGR J16479−4514 performed with Suzaku in 2012 February. During this observation, about 80 per cent of the short orbital period (Porb ∼ 3.32 d) was covered as continuously as possible for the first time. The source light curve displays variability of more than two orders of magnitude, starting with a very low emission state (10⁻¹³ erg cm⁻² s⁻¹; 1–10 keV) lasting the first 46 ks, consistent with being due to the X-ray eclipse by the supergiant companion. The transition to the uneclipsed X-ray emission is energy dependent. Outside the eclipse, the source spends most of the time at a level of 6–7 × 10⁻¹² erg cm⁻² s⁻¹ punctuated by two structured faint flares with a duration of about 10 and 15 ks, respectively, reaching a peak flux of 3–4 × 10−11 erg cm⁻² s⁻¹, separated by about 0.2 in orbital phase. Remarkably, the first faint flare occurs at a similar orbital phase of the bright flares previously observed in the system. This indicates the presence of a phase-locked large-scale structure in the supergiant wind, driving a higher accretion rate on to the compact object. The average X-ray spectrum is hard and highly absorbed, with a column density, NH, of 1023 cm⁻², clearly in excess of the interstellar absorption. There is no evidence for variability of the absorbing column density, except that during the eclipse, where a less absorbed X-ray spectrum is observed. A narrow Fe Kα emission line at 6.4 keV is viewed along the whole orbit, with an intensity which correlates with the continuum emission above 7 keV. The scattered component visible during the X-ray eclipse allowed us to directly probe the wind density at the orbital separation, resulting in ρw = 7 × 10⁻¹⁴ g cm⁻³. Assuming a spherical geometry for the supergiant wind, the derived wind density translates into a ratio M˙w/v∞ =7×10⁻¹⁷ M⊙ km⁻¹ which, assuming terminal velocities in a large range 500–3000 km s⁻¹, implies an accretion luminosity two orders of magnitude higher than that observed. As a consequence, a mechanism should be at work reducing the mass accretion rate. Different possibilities are discussed.