Rainbow Rulings: Separate but Equal is Unconstitutional

dc.contributor.authorNaylor, Lorenda
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-17T15:33:46Z
dc.date.available2018-04-17T15:33:46Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractIn June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court (USSC) delivered two landmark decisions for the Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual and Transgender (LGBT) community: United States v. Windsor (570 U.S. 2013) and Hollingsworth, et al., v. Kristin M. Perry (570 U.S. 2013). Known as the “Rainbow Rulings” and the “Twin Victories,” these two cases advance both gay rights and civil rights. The Windsor case struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) of 1996 (Pub L. 104-199), which defined marriage at the federal level as between a man and a woman; rendering the definition unconstitutional. As a result, federal benefits must be instated to married gay couples.en
dc.format.extent2 pagesen
dc.genrenewsletter articlesen
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/M2KS6J67T
dc.identifier.citationNaylor, L. (2013) Rainbow Rulings: Seperate but Equal is Unconstitutional. Public Administration Times. Retrieved April 11, 2018 from https://patimes.org/rainbow-rulings-separate-equal-unconstitutional/.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/8776
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPublic Administration Timesden
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Baltimore
dc.subjectU.S. Supreme Courten
dc.subjectLGBT Communityen
dc.subjectUnited States V. Windsoren
dc.subjectHollingsworth, et al, . Kristin M. Perryen
dc.subjectGay Rightsen
dc.subjectCivil Rightsen
dc.titleRainbow Rulings: Separate but Equal is Unconstitutionalen
dc.typeTexten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rainbow Rulings- Separate but Equal is Unconstitutional - PA TIMES Online | PA TIMES Online.pdf
Size:
770.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: