Impact of Aerosols From Urban and Shipping Emission Sources on Terrestrial Carbon Uptake and Evapotranspiration: A Case Study in East Asia

dc.contributor.authorHuang, Min
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, James H.
dc.contributor.authorCarmichael, Gregory R.
dc.contributor.authorSantanello, Joseph A.
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Sujay V.
dc.contributor.authorStauffer, Ryan M.
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Anne M.
dc.contributor.authorWeinheimer, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jun Dong
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-20T17:32:10Z
dc.date.available2024-06-20T17:32:10Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-03
dc.description.abstractThis study quantifies the immediate influences of aerosols from urban anthropogenic and shipping emission sources on carbon and water fluxes in East Asia on a cloudy day in spring 2016 when strong regional pollution transport occurred and intensive field campaign measurements are available. Within National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)'s Land Information System (LIS), a long-term offline Noah-multiparameterization (MP) simulation with dynamic vegetation is performed. Modeled soil moisture and leaf area index are evaluated with satellite observations to ensure that land surface conditions are moderately well reproduced. The LIS output is then used to initialize several coupled NASA-Unified Weather Research and Forecasting model simulations with online chemistry in which urban anthropogenic and shipping emissions are (1) largely based on the Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution Phase 2 inventory for 2010, (2) reduced by 20% and 50% for all chemical species, and (3) adjusted only for nitrogen oxides (NOx) using satellite observations. Overall, modeled gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration almost linearly increase with the all-species emission reductions, but their responses to emission-induced aerosol optical depth (AOD) changes show strong spatial variability resulting from combined radiation and temperature impacts. Using satellite-observation-constrained NOx emissions, modeled nitrogen species and AOD better match various measurements at some locations/times. All-species and NOx-only emission adjustments lead to different gross primary productivity and evapotranspiration changes with AOD, especially over South Korea. This study demonstrates the importance of accurately quantifying emission impacts on atmosphere-biosphere interactions. Improving more species' emission inputs for Earth system models, including applying effective chemical data assimilation methods, is strongly encouraged.
dc.description.sponsorshipWe acknowledge NASA ROSESSUSMAP funding and NASA High‐End Computing program, as well astechnical support from SMAP, KORUS‐AQ, LIS‐NUWRF, and Aura Science Teams. Aircraft acetonitrile observations were taken by a University of Oslo group (PI: A. Wisthaler).Instructions for obtaining LIS and NUWRF can be found at https://lis.gsfc.nasa.gov/releases;http://nuwrf.gsfc.nasa.gov/doc. Related model fields can be found in Huang (2019), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3529833. Observational datasets related to this work can be obtained from the following locations: SMAP SM and L4C: https://nsidc.org/data/smap/smap‐data.html; ESA CCI SM: http://www.esa‐soilmoisture‐cci.org; satelliteLAI and precipitation products: https://earthdata.nasa.gov; KORUS‐AQ speci-fic measurements: https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/new_web/DRAGON‐KORUS‐AQ_2016.html and https://www‐air.larc.nasa.gov/missions/korus‐aq/index.html (doi: 10.5067/Suborbital/KORUSAQ/DATA01); atmospheric forcing (FNL) and surface meteorologi-cal observations: https://rda.ucar.edu;and OCO‐2/MODIS derived SIF:https://daac.ornl.gov/cgi‐bin/dsviewer.pl?ds_id=1696 (doi: 10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1696)
dc.description.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2019JD030818
dc.format.extent23 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2kzsa-eytn
dc.identifier.citationHuang, Min, James H. Crawford, Gregory R. Carmichael, Joseph A. Santanello, Sujay V. Kumar, Ryan M. Stauffer, Anne M. Thompson, Andrew J. Weinheimer, and Jun Dong Park. “Impact of Aerosols From Urban and Shipping Emission Sources on Terrestrial Carbon Uptake and Evapotranspiration: A Case Study in East Asia.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 125, no. 2 (3 January 2020): e2019JD030818. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030818.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030818
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/34743
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAGU
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC GESTAR II
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rightsPublic Domain
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
dc.subjectaerosol feedback
dc.subjectair pollution in East Asia
dc.subjectatmosphere-biosphere interactions
dc.subjectcarbon and water cycles
dc.subjecturban and shipping emissions
dc.titleImpact of Aerosols From Urban and Shipping Emission Sources on Terrestrial Carbon Uptake and Evapotranspiration: A Case Study in East Asia
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7829-0920

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JGRAtmospheres2020HuangImpactofAerosolsFromUrbanandShippingEmissionSourcesonTerrestrialCarbonUptake.pdf
Size:
56.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jgrd55989sup00012019jd030818figure_si1.pdf
Size:
3.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections