PACMan2: Next Steps in Proposal Review Management
dc.contributor.author | Strolger, Louis-Gregory | |
dc.contributor.author | Pegues, Jamila | |
dc.contributor.author | King, Tegan | |
dc.contributor.author | Miles, Nathan | |
dc.contributor.author | Ramsahoye, Michelle | |
dc.contributor.author | II, Keith Ceruti | |
dc.contributor.author | Blacker, Brett | |
dc.contributor.author | Reid, I. Neill | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-06T17:50:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-06T17:50:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-03-07 | |
dc.description.abstract | With the start of a new Great Observatories era, there is renewed concern that the demand for these forefront facilities, through proposal pressure, will exceed conventional peer-review management’s capacity for ensuring an unbiased and efficient selection. There is need for new methods, strategies, and tools to facilitate those reviews. Here, we describe PACMan2, an updated tool for proposal review management that utilizes machine learning models and techniques to topically categorize proposals and reviewers, to match proposals to reviewers, and to facilitate proposal assignments, mitigating some conflicts of interest. We find that the classifier has cross-validation accuracy of 80.0 ± 2.2% on proposals for time on the Hubble Space Telescope and the James Webb Space Telescope | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | We thank our anonymous referee for important improvements to this manuscript. We also thank Alessandra Alossi, Claus Leitherer, Christine Chen, Kathrine Alatalo, Molly Peeples, and Laura Watkins for their discussions in preparing and implementing PACMan. MR thanks the STScI Space Astronomy Summer Program. KC thanks The Baltimore Polytechnic Ingenuity Project for enabling their participation in this work. This research has made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System Bibliographic Services, in particular, the API for the Astrophysics Data System. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04220 | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 10 pages | en_US |
dc.genre | journal articles | en_US |
dc.genre | preprints | en_US |
dc.identifier | doi:10.13016/m2dsbo-adoz | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.04220 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11603/27419 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Mathematics Department Collection | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Student Collection | |
dc.rights | This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author. | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) | * |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.title | PACMan2: Next Steps in Proposal Review Management | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |
dcterms.creator | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2065-6034 | en_US |