A Machine-Learning Approach to Mitigate Ground Clutter Effects in the GPM Combined Radar-Radiometer Algorithm (CORRA) Precipitation Estimates

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2024-11-13

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Grecu, Mircea, Gerald M. Heymsfield, Stephen Nicholls, Stephen Lang, and William S. Olson. “A Machine-Learning Approach to Mitigate Ground Clutter Effects in the GPM Combined Radar-Radiometer Algorithm (CORRA) Precipitation Estimates,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology. November 13, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-24-0048.1.

Rights

This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain

Subjects

Abstract

In this study, a machine-learning based methodology is developed to mitigate the effects of ground clutter on precipitation estimates from the Global Precipitation Mission Combined Radar-Radiometer Algorithm. Ground clutter can corrupt and obscure precipitation echo in radar observations, leading to inaccuracies in precipitation estimates. To improve upon previous work, this study introduces a general machine learning (ML) approach that enables a systematic investigation and a better understanding of uncertainties in clutter mitigation. To allow for a less restrictive exploration of conditional relations between precipitation above the lowest clutter-free bin and surface precipitation, reflectivity observations above the clutter are included in a fixed-size set of predictors along with the precipitation type, surface type, and freezing level to estimate surface precipitation rates, and several ML-based estimation methods are investigated. A Neural Network Model (NN) is ultimately identified as the best candidate for systematic evaluations, as it is computationally fast to apply while effective in applications. The NN provides unbiased estimates; however, it does not significantly outperform a simple bias correction approach in reducing random errors in the estimates. The similar performance of other ML approaches suggests that the NN’s limited improvement beyond bias removal is due to indeterminacies in the data rather than limitations in the ML approach itself.