Constrained Energy Minimization (CEM) for Hyperspectral Target Detection: Theory and Generalizations
Links to Files
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Chang, Chein-I. “Constrained Energy Minimization (CEM) for Hyperspectral Target Detection: Theory and Generalizations.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3424281.
Rights
© 2024 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
Subjects
target-constrained interference-minimized filter (TCIMF)
Iterative methods
Hyperspectral imaging
kernel CEM (KCEM)
Training
Finite impulse response filters
iterative random training sampling CEM (IRTS-CEM)
Constrained energy minimization (CEM)
ensemble cascaded CEM (ECEM)
Object detection
iterative CEM (ICEM)
Detectors
Kernel
hierarchical CEM (HCEM)
UMBC Remote Sensing and Image Process Laboratory
Iterative methods
Hyperspectral imaging
kernel CEM (KCEM)
Training
Finite impulse response filters
iterative random training sampling CEM (IRTS-CEM)
Constrained energy minimization (CEM)
ensemble cascaded CEM (ECEM)
Object detection
iterative CEM (ICEM)
Detectors
Kernel
hierarchical CEM (HCEM)
UMBC Remote Sensing and Image Process Laboratory
Abstract
Target detection is a fundamental task of hyperspectral imaging where constrained energy minimization (CEM) has been widely used for subpixel target detection technique. Due to its effectiveness, CEM has been generalized to various versions, such as kernel CEM (KCEM), kernel target constrained interference-minimized filter (KTCIMF), ensemble cascaded CEM (ECEM), hierarchical CEM (HCEM). Unfortunately, these generalizations overlooked the key design rationale behind CEM. This paper revisits CEM for hyperspectral target detection (HTD) and proves how and why it works mathematically. Specifically, several new CEM generalizations are derived and particularly noteworthy. By including spatial information in an iterative process, KCEM, ECEM, HCEM can be generalized to iterative KCEM (IKCEM), iterative KTCIMF (IKTCIMF), iterative ECEM (IECEM), iterative HCEM (IHCEM). Also, by utilizing an iterative random training sampling (IRTS) to generate the desired target signature to be detected, these algorithms are further generalized to iterative random training sampling KCEM (IRTS-KCEM), iterative random training sampling ECEM (IRTS-ECEM), iterative random training sampling HCEM (IRTS-HCEM). A comprehensive analysis along with comparative study on these generalizations is conducted through extensive experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of IKCEM, IHCEM and IECEM.
