The Response of the Amazon Ecosystem to the Photosynthetically Active Radiation Fields: Integrating Impacts of Biomass Burning Aerosol and Clouds in the NASA GEOS ESM

dc.contributor.authorBian, Huisheng
dc.contributor.authorLee, Eunjee
dc.contributor.authorKoster, Randal D.
dc.contributor.authorBarahona, Donifan
dc.contributor.authorChin, Mian
dc.contributor.authorColarco, Peter R.
dc.contributor.authorDarmenov, Anton
dc.contributor.authorMahanama, Sarith
dc.contributor.authorManyin, Michael
dc.contributor.authorNorris, Peter
dc.contributor.authorShilling, John
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hongbin
dc.contributor.authorZeng, Fanwei
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-08T19:33:45Z
dc.date.available2021-04-08T19:33:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-24
dc.description.abstractThe Amazon experiences fires every year, and the resulting biomass burning aerosols, together with cloud particles, influence the penetration of sunlight through the atmosphere, increasing the ratio of diffuse to direct photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) reaching the vegetation canopy and thereby potentially increasing ecosystem productivity. In this study, we use the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) model running with coupled aerosol, cloud, radiation, and ecosystem modules to investigate the impact of Amazon biomass burning aerosols on ecosystem productivity, as well as the role of the Amazon’s clouds in tempering the impact. The study focuses on a seven-year period (2010–2016) during which the Amazon experienced a variety of dynamic environments (e.g., La Niña, normal years, and El Niño). The radiative impacts of biomass burning aerosols on ecosystem productivity – call here the aerosol light fertilizer effect – are found to increase Amazonian Gross Primary Production (GPP) by 2.6 % via a 3.8 % increase in diffuse PAR (DFPAR) despite a 5.4 % decrease in direct PAR (DRPAR) on multiyear average. On a monthly basis, this increase in GPP can be as large as 9.9 % (occurring in August 2010). Consequently, the net primary production (NPP) in the Amazon is increased by 1.5 %, or ~92 TgCyr−1– equivalent to ~37 % of the carbon lost due to Amazon fires over the seven years considered. Clouds, however, strongly regulate the effectiveness of the aerosol light fertilizer effect. The efficiency of the fertilizer effect is highest for cloud-free conditions and linearly decreases with increasing cloud amount until the cloud fraction reaches ~0.8, at which point the aerosol-influenced light changes from being a stimulator to an inhibitor of plant growth. Nevertheless, interannual changes in the overall strength of the aerosol light fertilizer effect are primarily controlled by the large interannual changes in biomass burning aerosols rather than by changes in cloudiness during the studied period.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank the various observational groups (i.e., AERONET, CERES-EBAF, FluxCom, FluxSat, and GoAmazon). HB was supported by the NASA ACMAP funding (no. 724 NNX17AG31G). PRC was supported by the Chemistry-Climate Modeling workpackage funded by the NASA Modeling, Analysis, and Prediction program (David Considine, program manager). JES was supported by the by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Atmospheric System Research, an Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research program; PNNL is operated for the DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. Resources supporting this work were provided by the NASA GMAO SI-Team and the High-End Computing (HEC) Program through the NASA Center for Climate Simulation (NCCS) at Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). FluxSat data were provided by Joanna Joiner group in GSFC. GoAmazon data were obtained from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility, a US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User facility managed by the Biological and Environmental Research programen_US
dc.description.urihttps://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2021-138/en_US
dc.format.extent26 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articles preprintsen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m27czn-ypr4
dc.identifier.citationBian, H., Lee, E., Koster, R. D., Barahona, D., Chin, M., Colarco, P. R., Darmenov, A., Mahanama, S., Manyin, M., Norris, P., Shilling, J., Yu, H., and Zeng, F.: The Response of the Amazon Ecosystem to the Photosynthetically Active Radiation Fields: Integrating Impacts of Biomass Burning Aerosol and Clouds in the NASA GEOS ESM , Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-138.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-138
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/21308
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEGU Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
dc.rightsPublic Domain Mark 1.0*
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/*
dc.titleThe Response of the Amazon Ecosystem to the Photosynthetically Active Radiation Fields: Integrating Impacts of Biomass Burning Aerosol and Clouds in the NASA GEOS ESMen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
acp-2021-138.pdf
Size:
1.82 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: