Classification of global aerosol types and its radiative effects using Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) data
Collections
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Mukhopadhyay, Swagata, Shantikumar S. Ningombam, A. V. Amoghavarsha, et al. “Classification of Global Aerosol Types and Its Radiative Effects Using Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Data.” Atmospheric Environment 362, September 12, 2025, 121530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121530.
Rights
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain
Public Domain
Abstract
The present study performed classification global aerosols based on particle linear depolarization ratio (PLDR) and single scattering albedo (SSA) provided from AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) Version 3.0 and Level 2.0 inversion products of 171 AERONET sites located in six continents. Current methodology could distinguish effectively between dust and non-dust aerosols using PLDR and SSA. These selected sites include dominant aerosol types such as, pure dust (PD), dust dominated mixture (DDM), pollution dominated mixture (PDM), very weakly absorbing (VWA), strongly absorbing (SA), moderately absorbing(MA), and weakly absorbing (WA). Biomass-burning aerosols which are associated with black carbon are assigned as combinations of WA, MA and SA. The key important findings show the sites in the Northern African region are predominantly influenced by PD, while south Asian sites are characterized by DDM as well as mixture of dust and pollution aerosols. Urban and industrialized regions located in Europe and North American sites are characterized by VWA, WA, and MA aerosols. Tropical regions, including South America, South-east-Asia and southern African sites which prone to forest and biomass-burning, are dominated by SA aerosols. The study further examined the impacts by radiative forcing for different aerosol types. Among the aerosol types, SA and VWA contribute with the highest (30.14 ± 8.04 Wm⁻²) and lowest (7.83 ± 4.12 Wm⁻²) atmospheric forcing, respectively. Consequently, atmospheric heating rates are found to be highest by SA (0.85 K day⁻¹) and lowest by VWA aerosols (0.22 Kday⁻¹). The current study provides a comprehensive report on aerosol optical, micro-physical and radiative properties for different aerosol types across six continents.