A numerical study of the nonlinear cascade of energy in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

dc.contributor.authorVerma, M. K.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, D. A.
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Melvyn
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, S.
dc.contributor.authorStribling, W. T.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-07T19:14:10Z
dc.date.available2023-11-07T19:14:10Z
dc.date.issued1996-10-01
dc.description.abstractPower spectra of solar wind magnetic field and velocity fluctuations more closely resemble those of turbulent fluids (spectral index of −5/3) than they do predictions for magnetofluid turbulence (a −3/2 index). Furthermore, the amount the solar wind is heated by turbulence is uncertain. To aid in the study of both of these issues, we report numerically derived energy cascade rates in magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence and compare them with predictions of MHD turbulence phenomenologies. Either of the commonly predicted spectral indices of 5/3 and 3/2 are consistent with the simulations. Explicit calculation of inertial range energy cascade rates in the simulations show that for unequal levels of fluctuations propagating parallel and antiparallel to the magnetic field, the majority species always cascades faster than does the minority species, and the cascade rates are in better agreement with a Kolmogoroff-like MHD turbulence phenomenology than with a generalized Kraichnan phenomenology even in situations where the fluctuations are much smaller than the mean magnetic field. The “Kolmogoroff constant” for MHD turbulence for small normalized cross helicity is roughly 6.7 in two dimensions and 3.6 for one calculation in three dimensions. For large normalized cross helicity, however, none of the existing models can account for the numerical results, although the Kolmogoroff-like case still works somewhat better than the Kraichnan-like. In particular, the applied magnetic field has much less influence than expected, and Alfvénicity is more important than predicted. These results imply the need for better phenomenological models to make clear predictions about the solar wind.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/96JA01773en_US
dc.format.extent7 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2dkgd-q1iq
dc.identifier.citationVerma, M. K., Roberts, D. A., Goldstein, M. L., Ghosh, S., and Stribling, W. T. (1996), A numerical study of the nonlinear cascade of energy in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, J. Geophys. Res., 101(A10), 21619–21625, doi:10.1029/96JA01773.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1029/96JA01773
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/30574
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAGUen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Goddard Planetary Heliophysics Institute (GPHI)
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.en_US
dc.rightsPublic Domain Mark 1.0*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/*
dc.titleA numerical study of the nonlinear cascade of energy in magnetohydrodynamic turbulenceen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5317-988Xen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1996_verma_MHDsimulation.pdf
Size:
1.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: