Self-reported colorectal cancer screening of Medicare beneficiaries in family medicine vs. internal medicine practices in the United States: a cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Angela Y
dc.contributor.authorDoubeni, Anna R B
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Karon L
dc.contributor.authorLaiyemo, Adeyinka O
dc.contributor.authorBriesacher, Becky
dc.contributor.authorTjia, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorDoubeni, Chyke A
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-07T16:40:48Z
dc.date.available2020-07-07T16:40:48Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-21
dc.description.abstractBackground The benefit of screening for decreasing the risk of death from colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown, yet many patients in primary care are still not undergoing screening according to guidelines. There are known variations in delivery of preventive health care services among primary care physicians. This study compared self-reported CRC screening rates and patient awareness of the need for CRC screening of patients receiving care from family medicine (FPs) vs. internal medicine (internists) physicians. Methods Nationally representative sample of non-institutionalized beneficiaries who received medical care from FPs or internists in 2006 (using Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey). The main outcome was the percentage of patients screened in 2007. We also examined the percentage of patients offered screening. Results Patients of FPs, compared to those of internists, were less likely to have received an FOBT kit or undergone home FOBT, even after accounting for patients' characteristics. Compared to internists, FPs' patients were more likely to have heard of colonoscopy, but were less likely to receive a screening colonoscopy recommendation (18% vs. 27%), or undergo a colonoscopy (43% vs. 46%, adjusted odds ratios [AOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]-- 0.65, 0.51-0.81) or any CRC screening (52% vs. 60%, AOR, CI--0.80, 0.68-0.94). Among subgroups examined, higher income beneficiaries receiving care from internists had the highest screening rate (68%), while disabled beneficiaries receiving care from FPs had the lowest screening rate (34%). Conclusion Patients cared for by FPs had a lower rate of screening compared to those cared for by internists, despite equal or higher levels of awareness; a difference that remained statistically significant after accounting for socioeconomic status and access to healthcare. Both groups of patients remained below the national goal of 70 percent.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDr. Doubeni is supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (5K01CA127118-02 & 1R01CA151736-01). Dr. Laiyemo is supported by the National Cancer Institute (5U54CA091431-09 S1).en_US
dc.description.urihttps://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-230X-12-23en_US
dc.format.extent9 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2z5m9-5ihp
dc.identifier.citationHiggins, A.Y., B Doubeni, A.R., Phillips, K.L. et al. Self-reported colorectal cancer screening of Medicare beneficiaries in family medicine vs. internal medicine practices in the United States: a cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol 12, 23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-23en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-23
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/19076
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Sociology and Anthropology Department Collection
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
dc.rightsAttribution 2.0 Generic*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/*
dc.titleSelf-reported colorectal cancer screening of Medicare beneficiaries in family medicine vs. internal medicine practices in the United States: a cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1471-230X-12-23.pdf
Size:
468.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: