Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO2 column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data

dc.contributor.authorJudd, Laura M.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Saadi, Jassim A.
dc.contributor.authorJanz, Scott J.
dc.contributor.authorKowalewski, Matthew G.
dc.contributor.authorPierce, R. Bradley
dc.contributor.authorSzykman, James J.
dc.contributor.authorValin, Lukas C.
dc.contributor.authorSwap, Robert
dc.contributor.authorCede, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Moritz
dc.contributor.authorTiefengraber, Martin
dc.contributor.authorAbuhassan, Nader
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, David
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-29T17:21:36Z
dc.date.available2020-01-29T17:21:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-22
dc.description.abstractNASA deployed the GeoTASO airborne UV–visible spectrometer in May–June 2017 to produce high-resolution (approximately 250 m×250 m) gapless NO₂ datasets over the western shore of Lake Michigan and over the Los Angeles Basin. The results collected show that the airborne tropospheric vertical column retrievals compare well with ground-based Pandora spectrometer column NO₂ observations (r²=0.91 and slope of 1.03). Apparent disagreements between the two measurements can be sensitive to the coincidence criteria and are often associated with large local variability, including rapid temporal changes and spatial heterogeneity that may be observed differently by the sunward-viewing Pandora observations. The gapless mapping strategy executed during the 2017 GeoTASO flights provides data suitable for averaging to coarser areal resolutions to simulate satellite retrievals. As simulated satellite pixel area increases to values typical of TEMPO (Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring Pollution), TROPOMI (TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument), and OMI (Ozone Monitoring Instrument), the agreement with Pandora measurements degraded, particularly for the most polluted columns as localized large pollution enhancements observed by Pandora and GeoTASO are spatially averaged with nearby less-polluted locations within the larger area representative of the satellite spatial resolutions (aircraft-to-Pandora slope: TEMPO scale =0.88; TROPOMI scale =0.77; OMI scale =0.57). In these two regions, Pandora and TEMPO or TROPOMI have the potential to compare well at least up to pollution scales of 30×10¹⁵ molecules cm⁻². Two publicly available OMI tropospheric NO₂ retrievals are found to be biased low with respect to these Pandora observations. However, the agreement improves when higher-resolution a priori inputs are used for the tropospheric air mass factor calculation (NASA V3 standard product slope =0.18 and Berkeley High Resolution product slope =0.30). Overall, this work explores best practices for satellite validation strategies with Pandora direct-sun observations by showing the sensitivity to product spatial resolution and demonstrating how the high-spatial-resolution NO₂ data retrieved from airborne spectrometers, such as GeoTASO, can be used with high-temporal-resolution ground-based column observations to evaluate the influence of spatial heterogeneity on validation results.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipWe would like to acknowledge the NASA Earth Science Division's GEO-CAPE Mission Study for funding GeoTASO flights, the LMOS science teams, Caroline Nowlan and Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad at Harvard SAO for providing knowledge and support in the use of the SAO AMF calculation tool, the South Coast Air Quality and Monitoring District (SCAQMD) and colleagues at UCLA and CalTech for providing accommodations for the Pandora instruments in the LA Basin, our EPA colleagues and site hosts for maintaining Pandora instruments in the LMOS domain, NASA SARP 2017 and NSRC, Barry Lefer and the NASA Tropospheric Composition Program for inviting us to fly as part of the Student Airborne Research Program in the LA Basin, and the NASA Langley Research Center pilots and flight crew during both field missions. EPA funding for this work was provided by the Air and Energy Research Program. Although this paper has been reviewed by the EPA and approved for publication, it does not necessarily reflect EPA policies or views. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/6091/2019/amt-12-6091-2019.htmlen_US
dc.format.extent21 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2a4br-5ict
dc.identifier.citationJudd, Laura M.; Al-Saadi, Jassim A.; Janz, Scott J.; Kowalewski, Matthew G.; Pierce, R. Bradley; Szykman, James J.; Valin, Lukas C.; Swap, Robert; Cede, Alexander; Mueller, Moritz; Tiefengraber, Martin; Abuhassan, Nader; Williams, David; Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO2 column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data; Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 12, 6091–6111 (2019); https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/6091/2019/amt-12-6091-2019.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6091-2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/17184
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEGUen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
dc.rightsPublic Domain Mark 1.0*
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/*
dc.subjectspatial resolutionen_US
dc.subjecttropospheric NO₂ columnen_US
dc.subjectairborne dataen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO2 column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne dataen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
amt-12-6091-2019.pdf
Size:
26.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: