Comparison Between Experimental Measurements and Numerical Simulations of Spheromak Formation in SSPX

dc.contributor.authorRomero-Talamás, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorHooper, E. B.
dc.contributor.authorHill, D. N.
dc.contributor.authorCohen, B. I
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, H. S.
dc.contributor.authorWood, R. D.
dc.contributor.authorMoller, J. M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T10:54:27Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T10:54:27Z
dc.date.issued2006-12-06
dc.description.abstractData from a recently installed insertable magnetic probe array in the Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment (SSPX) [E. B. Hooper, L. D. Pearlstein, and R. H. Bulmer, Nucl. Fusion 39, 863 (1999)] is combined with high-speed images and compared against NIMROD [C. R. Sovinec, A. H. Glasser, T. A. Gianakon, D. C. Barnes, R. A. Nebel, S. E. Kruger, D. D. Schnack, S. J. Plimpton, A. Tarditi, and M. S. Chu, J. Comp. Phys. 195, 355 (2004)], a 3D resistive magnetohydrodynamic code that is used to simulate SSPX plasmas. The experiment probe consists of a linear array of chip inductors arranged in clusters that are spaced every 2 cm, and spans the entire machine radius at the flux conserver midplane. Both the experiment and the numerical simulations show the appearance, shortly after breakdown, of a column with a hollow current profile that precedes magnetic reconnection, a process essential to the formation of closed magnetic flux surfaces. However, there are differences between the experiment and the simulation in how the column evolves after it is formed. These differences are studied to help identify the mechanisms that eventually lead to closed-flux surfaces (azimuthally averaged) and flux amplification, which occur in both the experiment and the simulation.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work performed under the auspices of the USDOE by LLNL under Contract 7405-Eng-48.
dc.description.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10894-006-9040-7
dc.format.extent4 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifier.citationRomero-Talamás, C., Hooper, E., Hill, D. et al. Comparison Between Experimental Measurements and Numerical Simulations of Spheromak Formation in SSPX. J Fusion Energ 26, 169–172 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-006-9040-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-006-9040-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/31468
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Mechanical Engineering Department Collection
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rightsPublic Domain Mark 1.0 en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
dc.titleComparison Between Experimental Measurements and Numerical Simulations of Spheromak Formation in SSPX
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-3126

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s10894-006-9040-7.pdf
Size:
352.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: