Comparison of Columnar Water Vapor Measurements During The Fall 1997 ARM Intensive Observation Period: Solar Transmittance Methods

dc.contributor.authorSchmid, B.
dc.contributor.authorMichalsky, J. J.
dc.contributor.authorSlater, D. W.
dc.contributor.authorBarnard, J. C.
dc.contributor.authorHalthore, R. N.
dc.contributor.authorLiljegren, J. C.
dc.contributor.authorHolben, B. N.
dc.contributor.authorEck, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorLivingston, J. M.
dc.contributor.authorRussell, P. B.
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-29T17:01:43Z
dc.date.available2024-04-29T17:01:43Z
dc.date.issued2000-01-23
dc.description.abstractIn the fall of 1997, during an Intensive Observation Period (IOP), the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program conducted a study of water vapor abundance measurement at its Southern Great Plains (SGP) site. Among a large number of instruments, four sun-tracking radiometers were present to measure the columnar water vapor (CWV). All four solar radiometers retrieve CWV by measuring total solar transmittance in the 0.94-gm water vapor absorption band and subtracting contributions due to Rayleigh, ozone and aerosol transmittances. The aerosol optical depth comparisons among the same four radiometers has been presented elsewhere (Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 17, 2725-2728, 1999). We have used three different methods to retrieve CWV. In a first round of comparison no attempt was made to standardize on the same radiative transfer model and its underlying water vapor spectroscopy. In the second round of comparison we used the same line-by-line code (which includes recently corrected H2O spectroscopy) to retrieve CAN from all four suntracking radiometers. This decreased the mean CWV by 8% or 13%. The spread of 8% in the solar radiometer results found when using the same model is an indication of the other-than-model uncertainties involved in determining CWV from solar transmittance measurements with current instrumentation.
dc.description.sponsorshipOffice of Earth Science, NASA Headquarters (Robert Curran and Jack Kaye) and the NOAA Office of Global Programs (Joel Levy) funded this research in part (BAER, SRI, and NASA ARC). It was also supported by the Office of Biological and Environment Research of the U.S. Department of Energy as part of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program.by grant DE-FG02-90ER61072 (SUNY) and by contract no. DE-AC02- 98CH10886 (Brokhaven), CHENG82-1010502-0002884 (Ames) and W-31-109-Eng-38 (Argonne). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the U.S. Department of Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute under contract DE-AC0676RLO 1830.The AERONET project is supported by the EOS Project Science Office (Michael King) and the Office of Earth Science, NASA Headquarters (Robert Curran)
dc.description.urihttps://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20010074719
dc.format.extent31 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.genrepreprints
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2ynmc-mram
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/33459
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC GESTAR II
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rightsPublic Domain
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
dc.subjectGeophysics
dc.titleComparison of Columnar Water Vapor Measurements During The Fall 1997 ARM Intensive Observation Period: Solar Transmittance Methods
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9801-1610

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
20010074719.pdf
Size:
1.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections