Comparison of ozone retrievals from the Pandora spectrometer system and Dobson spectrophotometer in Boulder, Colorado
Loading...
Links to Files
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2015-08-24
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Herman, J., et al. "Comparison of ozone retrievals from the Pandora spectrometer system and Dobson spectrophotometer in Boulder, Colorado" Atmos. Meas. Tech. 8 (24 Aug 2015): 3407–3418. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3407-2015.
Rights
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
Public Domain Mark 1.0
Subjects
Abstract
A comparison of retrieved total column ozone
(TCO) amounts between the Pandora #34 spectrometer system and the Dobson #061 spectrophotometer from directsun observations was performed on the roof of the Boulder, Colorado, NOAA building. This paper, part of an ongoing study, covers a 1-year period starting on 17 December 2013. Both the standard Dobson and Pandora TCO retrievals required a correction, TCOcorr = TCO (1 + C(T )),
using a monthly varying effective ozone temperature, TE, derived from a temperature and ozone profile climatology. The
correction is used to remove a seasonal difference caused by
using a fixed temperature in each retrieval algorithm. The respective corrections C(TE) are CPandora = 0.00333(TE−225)
and CDobson = −0.0013(TE − 226.7) per degree K. After
the applied corrections removed most of the seasonal retrieval dependence on ozone temperature, TCO agreement
between the instruments was within 1 % for clear-sky conditions. For clear-sky observations, both co-located instruments tracked the day-to-day variation in total column ozone
amounts with a correlation of r² = 0.97 and an average offset
of 1.1 ± 5.8 DU. In addition, the Pandora TCO data showed
0.3 % annual average agreement with satellite overpass data
from AURA/OMI (Ozone Monitoring Instrument) and 1 %
annual average offset with Suomi-NPP/OMPS (Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership, the nadir viewing portion
of the Ozone Mapper Profiler Suite).