A Comparative Evaluation of Snowflake Particle Size and Shape Estimation Techniques used by the Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP), Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera (MASC), and Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer (2DVD)

Abstract

Measurements of snowflake particle size and shape are important for studying the snow microphysics. While a number of instruments exist that are designed to measure these important parameters, this study focuses on the measurement techniques of three digital video disdrometers: the Precipitation Imaging Package (PIP), the Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera (MASC) and the Two-Dimensional Video Disdrometer (2DVD). To gain a better understanding of the relative strengths and weaknesses of these instruments and to provide a foundation upon which comparisons can be made between studies using data from different instruments, we perform a comparative analysis of the measurement algorithms employed by each of the three instruments by applying the algorithms to snowflake images captured by PIP during the ICEP-POP 2018 field campaign.

Our analysis primarily focuses on the measurements of area, equivalent diameter, and aspect ratio. Our findings indicate that area and equi-area diameter measurements using the 2DVD camera setup should be the most accurate, followed by MASC, which is slightly more accurate than PIP. In terms of the precision of the area and equi-area diameter measurements, however, MASC is considerably more precise than PIP or 2DVD, which provide similar precision once the effects of the PIP image compression algorithm are taken into account. Both PIP and MASC use shape-fitting algorithms to measure aspect ratio. While our analysis of the MASC aspect ratio suggests the measurements are reliable, our findings indicate that both the ellipse and rectangle aspect ratios produced by PIP under-performed considerably due to the shortcomings of the PIP shape-fitting techniques. That said, we also demonstrate that reliable measurements of aspect ratio can be retrieved from PIP by reprocessing the PIP images using either the MASC shape-fitting technique or a tensor-based ellipse-fitting technique. Because of differences in instrument design, 2DVD produces measurements of particle horizontal and vertical extent rather than length and width. Furthermore, the 2DVD measurements of particle horizontal extent can be contaminated by horizontal particle motion. Our findings indicate that, although the correction technique used to remove the horizontal motion contamination performs remarkably well with snowflakes despite being designed for use with rain drops, the 2DVD measurements of particle horizontal extent are potentially unreliable.