Perspectives on NO, NOᵧ, and fine aerosol sources and variability during SONEX

Date

1999-10-15

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Thompson, Anne M., Lynn C. Sparling, Yutaka Kondo, Bruce E. Anderson, Gerald L. Gregory, and Glen W. Sachse. “Perspectives on NO, NOᵧ, and Fine Aerosol Sources and Variability during SONEX.” Geophysical Research Letters 26, no. 20 (October 15, 1999): 3073–76. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900581.

Rights

This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain

Subjects

Abstract

Distributions of upper tropospheric tracer data on each of the 14 science flights of SONEX (SASS [Subsonics Assessment] Ozone and Nitrogen Oxides Experiment) provide a statistical overview of NO, NOᵧ and fine aerosol variability during SONEX (an aircraft mission conducted in October and November 1997). The wide range of variability of NO from all sources provides a perspective on the aircraft perturbation. Background distributions of NOᵧ are somewhat elevated inside flight corridors relative to outside; fine aerosol and NO/NOᵧ in and out of corridors are similar. The potential vorticity of air sampled during SONEX is low relative to the NAFC (North Atlantic Flight Corridor) as a whole, due either to advection of lower latitude air into the corridor or biases in sampling to avoid the stratosphere. High NO/NOᵧ (>0.4) from fresh lightning and aircraft sources was usually associated with pv much lower than the NAFC as a whole. Air masses identified as tropospheric by a low ozone criterion nevertheless have high pv, a marker for stratospheric air. Thus, stratospheric and surface sources also contribute to overall variability. A statistically robust assessment of the relative aircraft NO contribution during SONEX, based on data alone, is unlikely, given the mixture of other NO sources within which the aircraft signal is embedded. This underscores the need for more data and modeling studies.