FREE-CHOICE PREFERENCE WHEN ONE ALTERNATIVE IS RARELY OR NEVER CHOSEN

Links to Files

http://novoperiodicos.ufpa.br/periodicos/index.php/rebac/article/view/761

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v1i1.761
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/35892

Collections

UMBC Faculty Collection
UMBC Psychology Department

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0507-8707

Date

2012-03-15

Type of Work

journal articles
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Catania, A. Charles, Deisy das Graças de Souza, and Koichi Ono. “FREE-CHOICE PREFERENCE WHEN ONE ALTERNATIVE IS RARELY OR NEVER CHOSEN.” Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento 1, no. 1 (2005): 51–59. https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v1i1.761.

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.

Subjects

Abstract

In free choice, two or more responses eligible for reinforcement are concurrently available, as when a pigeon’s pecks on either of two keys can produce fixed-interval (FI) reinforcers. In forced choice, only one eligible response is available, as when pecks on one key can produce FI reinforcers but extinction (EXT) is arranged for pecks on a second key. Free choice is typically preferred when pitted against forced choice in terminal links of concurrent-chain or multiple concurrent-chain schedules. When multiple concurrent-chain schedules arrange conditions A and B respectively for left and right terminal links during one initial-link stimulus but their reversal during a second initiallink stimulus, preferences can be determined within sessions as differences between relative initial-link rates. The experimental question was whether free-choice preference is demonstrable even with one free-choice alternative rarely or never chosen. A history of multiple concurrent-chains with equal single-FI terminal links was followed by training, independent of initial links, of FI 20-s (green key), FI 40-s (yellow key), and EXT (red key). Multiple concurrent chain schedules then pitted free-choice terminal links with green (FI 20-s) and yellow (FI 40-s) keys against forced choice terminal links with green (FI 20-s) and red (EXT) keys. These terminal links maintained responding almost exclusively on the green key whether the other key was yellow or red, and all reinforcers were produced by green-key responding. Even with reinforcers equal and with the yellow alternative rarely or never chosen, the green-yellow terminal link (free choice) was preferred to the green-red (forced choice) terminal link.