Hitomi Constraints on the 3.5 keV Line in the Perseus Galaxy Cluster
Links to Files
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Aharonian, F. A., H. Akamatsu, F. Akimoto, S. W. Allen, L. Angelini, K. A. Arnaud, M. Audard, et al. “Hitomi Constraints on the 3.5 KeV Line in the Perseus Galaxy Cluster.” The Astrophysical Journal Letters 837, no. 1 (March 2017): L15. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa61fa.
Rights
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
Public Domain Mark 1.0
Subjects
Abstract
High-resolution X-ray spectroscopy with Hitomi was expected to resolve the origin of the faint unidentified
E ≈ 3.5 keV emission line reported in several low-resolution studies of various massive systems, such as galaxies
and clusters, including the Perseus cluster. We have analyzed the Hitomi first-light observation of the Perseus
cluster. The emission line expected for Perseus based on the XMM-Newton signal from the large cluster sample
under the dark matter decay scenario is too faint to be detectable in the Hitomi data. However, the previously
reported 3.5 keV flux from Perseus was anomalously high compared to the sample-based prediction. We find no
unidentified line at the reported high flux level. Taking into account the XMM measurement uncertainties for this
region, the inconsistency with Hitomi is at a 99% significance for a broad dark matter line and at 99.7% for a
narrow line from the gas. We do not find anomalously high fluxes of the nearby faint K line or the Ar satellite line
that were proposed as explanations for the earlier 3.5 keV detections. We do find a hint of a broad excess near the
energies of high-n transitions of S XVI (E ≈ 3.44 keV rest-frame)—a possible signature of charge exchange in the
molecular nebula and another proposed explanation for the unidentified line. While its energy is consistent with
XMM pn detections, it is unlikely to explain the MOS signal. A confirmation of this interesting feature has to wait
for a more sensitive observation with a future calorimeter experiment
