A Comparison of the Academic and Social Attitudes of Eighth Grade Special Education Students with and Without a History of Elementary School Retention
Loading...
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2016-05-03
Type of Work
Department
Program
Masters of Education
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
Collection may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. To obtain information or permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Goucher Special Collections & Archives at 410-337-6347 or email archives@goucher.edu.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the academic and social attitudes of 8th grade
special education students that have been retained and those that have not. This is important
because a students’ attitude can affect their success in life and school. The null hypotheses are that there are
no statistically significant difference in the mean Social Attitude, Academic
Attitude, and Total School
Attitude scores in eighth
grade special education students that have a
history of elementary school rete
ntion and age, gender,
race, and special education classification
matched to
students that
do not.
This study compared the academic and social attitudes of
students that were retained (n=9) and that were not (n=9).
The researcher created a
survey
to
assess
the student’s
social and academic attitudes.
The mean Social Attitude score was
significantly lower for the retention group (Mean = 21.56, SD = 7.89) than for the non
-
retention
group (Mean = 35.33, SD = 6.91) [t(8) = .007, p < .01]. The mean Academic Att
itude score was
also significantly lower for the retention group (Mean = 24.11, SD = 8.10) than for the non
-
retention group (Mean = 40.67, SD = 3.39) [t(8) = .002, p < .01]. Finally, the mean Total School
Attitude score was significantly lower for the rete
ntion group (Mean = 45.67, SD = 15.67) than
for the non
-
retention group (Mean = 76.00, SD = 9.08) [t(8) = .003, p < .01].
Implications of the
findings and ideas for future research are discussed.
Thus, the null hypothesis was rejected.