A Comparison of the Academic and Social Attitudes of Eighth Grade Special Education Students with and Without a History of Elementary School Retention
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Program
Masters of Education
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
Collection may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law.  To obtain information or permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Goucher Special Collections & Archives at 410-337-6347 or email archives@goucher.edu.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the academic and social attitudes of 8th grade 
special education students that have been retained and those that have not. This is important 
because a students’ attitude can affect their success in life and school.  The null hypotheses are that there are
no statistically significant difference in the mean Social Attitude, Academic 
Attitude, and Total School 
Attitude scores in eighth 
grade special education students that have a 
history of elementary school rete
ntion and age, gender, 
race, and special education classification 
matched to
students that 
do not. 
This study compared the academic and social attitudes of 
students that were retained (n=9) and that were not (n=9). 
The researcher created a
survey 
to 
assess
the student’s
social and academic attitudes. 
The mean Social Attitude score was 
significantly lower for the retention group (Mean = 21.56, SD = 7.89) than for the non
-
retention 
group (Mean = 35.33, SD = 6.91) [t(8) = .007, p < .01].  The mean Academic Att
itude score was 
also significantly lower for the retention group (Mean = 24.11, SD = 8.10) than for the non
-
retention group (Mean = 40.67, SD = 3.39) [t(8) = .002, p < .01]. Finally, the mean Total School 
Attitude score was significantly lower for the rete
ntion group (Mean = 45.67, SD = 15.67) than 
for the non
-
retention group (Mean = 76.00, SD = 9.08) [t(8) = .003, p < .01].
Implications of the 
findings and ideas for future research are discussed.
Thus, the null hypothesis was rejected.
