The Relationship between DIBELS Scores and Reading Comprehension Grades in First Grade
Loading...
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2013-05
Type of Work
Department
Program
Masters of Education
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
Collection may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. To obtain information or permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Goucher Special Collections & Archives at 410-337-6347 or email archives@goucher.edu.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between scores on a commonly
used reading screening test (the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills, or DIBELS)
and reading comprehension grades of first grade students. The concurrent and predictive
relationships between DIBELS scores and comprehension grades (based on percentage scores of
Treasures First Grade Weekly Assessments) were examined using fall and spring assessment
(DIBELS) data and grades. These relationships were of interest because DIBELS scores are
used to form small reading groups, which are a source of intense comprehension instruction.
Even though DIBELS subtests do not assess comprehension directly, they have an effect on
comprehension skills because of the placement of students in these groups. Different groups
receive different types of comprehension instruction based in part on DIBELS scores, so
understanding the relationship between DIBELS scores and comprehension could help inform
instruction and ensure interventions are appropriate.
No statistically significant correlations were found between fall and spring DIBELS
scores and reading comprehension scores. The only significant correlations found were those
between two DIBELS subtest scores (Correct Letter Sounds and Whole Words Read). While
this study showed limited correlations between DIBELS and comprehension grades, other
studies have suggested DIBELS has satisfactory validity and reliability. Overall, the results
supported the conclusion that teachers should use caution and consider data in addition to
DIBELS results when making instructional decisions.