Implementing a Statewide Prehospital Sepsis Protocol: Perspectives of Emergency Medical Services Medical Directors

dc.contributor.authorGarfinkel, Eric
dc.contributor.authorTanigawa, Makoto
dc.contributor.authorMargolis, Asa
dc.contributor.authorLevy, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-02T18:59:16Z
dc.date.available2022-06-02T18:59:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-03
dc.description.abstractBackground Sepsis is a medical emergency that requires prompt recognition and treatment. Multiple Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies across the United States have implemented sepsis protocols. In 2016, Maryland instituted its own state-wide EMS sepsis protocol which includes fluid resuscitation, vasopressor administration, and requires alerting the hospital of an incoming sepsis patient. Objective The purpose of this study was to quantify the perspectives of EMS medical directors in Maryland regarding prehospital sepsis care and to identify challenges encountered during the implementation of the statewide sepsis protocol. Methods A 17-question survey was sent to all 24 jurisdictional medical directors in the state of Maryland. Results A total of 14 (58%) medical directors responded, representing four of the five EMS regions in the state. More than half (57%) stated sepsis alerting was a priority in their jurisdiction; however, in a listing of eight initiatives, sepsis was the least prioritized. Most (64%) respondents believed their clinicians had adequate training on sepsis. A majority (79%) of medical directors surveyed felt that core measures of sepsis management would be beneficial. The potentially most helpful core measures were the volume of IV fluid administration (92%), true positive sepsis alerts (83%), and cases of failure to activate a sepsis alert (75%). Engagement of field personnel was rated as the biggest challenge for the implementation of a sepsis protocol in general, and lack of a thermometer on EMS units (50%) was the largest hurdle specifically in the 2016 statewide sepsis protocol. Surveyed medical directors (86%) believe the most difficult obstacle to overcome for EMS clinicians in the treatment of sepsis are nonspecific signs and symptoms. Conclusions Prehospital sepsis care was viewed to be important amongst the medical directors surveyed. However, significant challenges to implementation of a sepsis protocol and delivery of prehospital sepsis care are perceived by jurisdictional medical directors. Additional investment and dedication to sepsis care will advance prehospital sepsis treatment in Maryland.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.cureus.com/articles/41574-implementing-a-statewide-prehospital-sepsis-protocol-perspectives-of-emergency-medical-services-medical-directorsen_US
dc.format.extent6 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2slfp-dbsc
dc.identifier.citationGarfinkel E, Tanigawa M, Margolis A, et al. (October 03, 2020) Implementing a Statewide Prehospital Sepsis Protocol: Perspectives of Emergency Medical Services Medical Directors. Cureus 12(10): e10781. doi:10.7759/cureus.10781en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/24805
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publishercureusen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Emergency Health Services Department Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleImplementing a Statewide Prehospital Sepsis Protocol: Perspectives of Emergency Medical Services Medical Directorsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8144-3281en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1612431328-1612431323-20210204-30437-1q64qpt.pdf
Size:
171.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: