Differential Reimbursement of Psychiatric Services by Psychiatrists and Other Medical Providers
Loading...
Collections
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2017-12-01
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Mark, Tami L. et al.; Differential Reimbursement of Psychiatric Services by Psychiatrists and Other Medical Providers; Psychiatric Services, 69, 3, p 281-285, 1 December, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700271
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Public Domain Mark 1.0
This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
Subjects
Abstract
Objective:
Given low psychiatrist participation in insurance networks, this study examines how psychiatrists are reimbursed in network and out of network under commercial insurance relative to other providers for the same diagnoses and services.
Methods:
Paid private insurance claims from the 2014 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database were analyzed. The sample included all services billed for 3.8 million individuals with a mental disorder as the primary diagnosis by psychiatrists, nonpsychiatrist medical doctors, psychologists, social workers, or psychiatric nurses. The authors determined the most common services provided by each provider type, the median reimbursement and median out-of-pocket payment for the services by provider type and by network status (in or out of network), and the proportion of bills for services delivered out of network.
Results:
“Evaluation and management” services for presenting problems of low to moderate and moderate to high severity were the two procedures most frequently billed by psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrist medical doctors. The median reimbursement for services for presenting problems of low to moderate and moderate to high severity was 13% less ($66 versus $76) and 20% less ($91 versus $114), respectively, for psychiatrists versus nonpsychiatrist medical doctors if the services were provided in network but 28% higher ($100 versus $78) and 6% higher ($122 versus $115), respectively, for psychiatrists versus nonpsychiatrist medical doctors for services provided out of network.
Conclusions:
Psychiatrists receive lower in-network reimbursement than nonpsychiatrist medical doctors for many of the same services. This may contribute to psychiatrists’ lower participation in insurance networks relative to other providers and has implications for patient cost sharing and access to psychiatrists.