How well do Earth system models reproduce the observed aerosol response to rapid emission reductions? A COVID-19 case study

dc.contributor.authorDigby, Ruth A. R.
dc.contributor.authorGillett, Nathan P.
dc.contributor.authorMonahan, Adam H.
dc.contributor.authorvon Salzen, Knut
dc.contributor.authorGkikas, Antonis
dc.contributor.authorSong, Qianqian
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Zhibo
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-06T18:52:19Z
dc.date.available2024-03-06T18:52:19Z
dc.date.issued2024-02-19
dc.description.abstractThe spring 2020 COVID-19 lockdowns led to a rapid reduction in aerosol and aerosol precursor emissions. These emission reductions provide a unique opportunity for model evaluation and to assess the potential efficacy of future emission control measures. We investigate changes in observed regional aerosol optical depth (AOD) during the COVID-19 lockdowns and use these observed anomalies to evaluate Earth system model simulations forced with COVID-19-like reductions in aerosols and greenhouse gases. Most anthropogenic source regions do not exhibit statistically significant changes in satellite retrievals of total or dust-subtracted AOD, despite the dramatic economic and lifestyle changes associated with the pandemic. Of the regions considered, only India exhibits an AOD anomaly that exceeds internal variability. Earth system models reproduce the observed responses reasonably well over India but initially appear to overestimate the magnitude of response in East China and when averaging over the Northern Hemisphere (0–70 N) as a whole. We conduct a series of sensitivity tests to systematically assess the contributions of internal variability, model input uncertainty, and observational sampling to the aerosol signal, and we demonstrate that the discrepancies between observed and simulated AOD can be partially resolved through the use of an updated emission inventory. The discrepancies can also be explained in part by characteristics of the observational datasets. Overall our results suggest that current Earth system models have potential to accurately capture the effects of future emission reductions.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; grant nos. RGPIN-2019-204986 to Adam H. Monahan and RGPIN-2017-04043 to Nathan P. Gillett). Antonis Gkikas has been supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (H.F.R.I.) under the 2nd Call for H.F.R.I. Research Projects to Support Post-Doctoral Researchers (project ATLANTAS; project no. 544).
dc.description.urihttps://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/2077/2024/
dc.format.extent21 pages
dc.genrejournal articles
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2uiqz-eclx
dc.identifier.citationDigby, Ruth A. R., Nathan P. Gillett, Adam H. Monahan, Knut von Salzen, Antonis Gkikas, Qianqian Song, and Zhibo Zhang. “How Well Do Earth System Models Reproduce the Observed Aerosol Response to Rapid Emission Reductions? A COVID-19 Case Study.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 24, no. 4 (February 19, 2024): 2077–97. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2077-2024.
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2077-2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/31842
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEGU
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Physics Department
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC GESTAR II
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleHow well do Earth system models reproduce the observed aerosol response to rapid emission reductions? A COVID-19 case study
dc.typeText
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9491-1654

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
acp-24-2077-2024.pdf
Size:
2.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
acp-24-2077-2024-supplement.pdf
Size:
4.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format