Developmental Networks Among Mentors and Mentees Involved in a Mentoring Intervention

dc.contributor.authorSoller, Brian
dc.contributor.authorDominguez, N.
dc.contributor.authorSood, A.
dc.contributor.authorMickel, N.
dc.contributor.authorMyers, O.
dc.contributor.authorTigges, B.
dc.contributor.authorWiskur, B.
dc.contributor.authorHelitzer, D.
dc.contributor.authorMorales, D.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-12T20:26:14Z
dc.date.available2023-07-12T20:26:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.description.abstractThe growing application of social network-based theories and methods (Burt et al., 2013) in scholarship on mentoring illustrates that mentoring goes beyond dyadic relationships comprising a senior mentor and a junior protégé (Higgins & Kram, 2001). However, limited data exist on the state of developmental networks of university faculty. This study examines developmental network characteristics among mentors and mentees participating in an ongoing intervention that aims to enhance career success through improved mentoring. Cross-sectional data come from 81 faculty mentors and mentees at three universities in the Southwestern United States. Using the online Modified Mentoring Network Questionnaire (MNQ), participants provided information on relationships with developers, who are people that have taken concerted action, and provided professional and/or personal guidance to help participants advance in their careers. An individual’s developmental network comprises relationships with developers. We conducted exploratory analyses examining key characteristics of mentors’ and mentees’ developmental networks. Participants received psychosocial and career support from an average of 4.9 developers (4.8 and 5.1 for mentors and mentees respectively) from 2.3 arenas (2.2 and 2.4 arenas for mentors and mentees, respectively). While the most common arena was the respondents’ current job/position (62%, 64% and 59% for all participants, mentors, and mentees respectively), developers were from graduate school (11%, 6% and 17%); prior jobs/positions (13%, 16% and 9%) and family (8%, 5% and 11%). Our preliminary findings suggest that developers are important for university faculty and that methods and insights from social network analysis can be applied to examine their support networks. As our study is part of an ongoing longitudinal intervention, these findings will inform future analyses that will examine changes in developmental network characteristics and its impact on participants’ careers.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by NIH/NIGMS U01GM132175 (Sood, PI); and 2U54GM104944 (Sy, PI).en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9258986/en_US
dc.format.extent11 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.genrepostprintsen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m204my-6qmp
dc.identifier.citationB., Soller, et al. "Developmental Networks Among Mentors and Mentees Involved in a Mentoring Intervention." The Chronicle of Mentoring & Coaching 05, no. 14 (06 July 2022): 375-382. https://www.mentor-cmc.com/cmc/cmc2021/MobilePagedReplica.action?pm=1&folio=375#pg375.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/28637
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMentoring Institute, University of New Mexicoen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Sociology and Anthropology Department Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.en_US
dc.subjectmentors/menteesen_US
dc.subjectModified Mentoring Network Questionnaire (MNQ)en_US
dc.titleDevelopmental Networks Among Mentors and Mentees Involved in a Mentoring Interventionen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: