Collective Efficacy as a Key Context in Neighborhood Support for Urban Youth
dc.contributor.author | Prince, Dana M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hohl, Bernadette | |
dc.contributor.author | Hunter, Bronwyn A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, Azure B. | |
dc.contributor.author | Matlin, Samantha L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hausman, Alice J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tebes, Jacob Kraemer | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-22T19:31:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-22T19:31:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03-06 | |
dc.description.abstract | Neighborhood context, including the physical and social environment, has been implicated as important contributors to positive youth development. A transactional approach to neighborhood asserts that place and people are mutually constitutive; negative perceptions of place are intrinsically bound with negative portrayals of stigmatized groups, including youth. Adult perceptions of neigh- borhood youth may contribute to an increased sense of alienation and youth antisocial behavior. This study uses street-i ntercept interviews with adults (N = 408) to examine the relationship between neighborhood conditions and adult support for neighborhood youth. A path model was used to examine the direct and indirect relationship of neighbor- hood constructs (safety, aesthetic quality, a nd walkability) on adult support for neighborhood youth. Neighborhood aesthetic quality and the walking environment were directly associated with adult support for youth, whereas perceived safety was indirectly associated. Collective efficacy partially explained these relationships. Findings support theorized relationships between people and places; improvements to neighborhood physical environment may directly impact resident adults’ perceptions of neighborhood young people. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was possible with support from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32 DA 019426, Tebes, PI), The Scattergood Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual disAbility Services, and Philadelphia Mural Arts Associates. The authors are grateful to Susan Florio, Erin Hoffman, Tanisha Mair, Roy Money, Lauren Moss-Racusin, Frank Snyder, and Nghi Thai from the Division of Prevention & Community Research and The Consultation Center, Yale University School of Medicine for their assistance | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajcp.12311 | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 11 pages | en_US |
dc.genre | journal articles | en_US |
dc.identifier | doi:10.13016/m2rkzi-qvi3 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dana M. Prince, Bernadette Hohl, Bronwyn A. Hunter, Collective Efficacy as a Key Context in Neighborhood Support for Urban Youth, Am J Community Psychol (2019) 63:179–189, DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12311 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12311 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11603/13136 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Society for Community Research and Action | en_US |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Psychology Department Collection | |
dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Faculty Collection | |
dc.rights | This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author. | |
dc.subject | collective efficacy | en_US |
dc.subject | youth support | en_US |
dc.subject | neighborhood conditions | en_US |
dc.subject | informal adult support | en_US |
dc.subject | physical decay | en_US |
dc.subject | physical and social disorder | en_US |
dc.title | Collective Efficacy as a Key Context in Neighborhood Support for Urban Youth | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 2.56 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: