Visual Deficits and Dysfunctions Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Links to Fileshttps://journals.lww.com/optvissci/Fulltext/2019/08000/Visual_Deficits_and_Dysfunctions_Associated_with.2.aspx
MetadataShow full item record
Type of Work14 pages
Citation of Original PublicationMerezhinskaya, Natalya; Mallia, Rita K.; Park, DoHwan; Bryden, Daniel W.; Mathur, Karan; Barker, Felix M. II; Visual Deficits and Dysfunctions Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis; Optometry and Vision Science 96,8; doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001407
RightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
concomitant eye injury
visual acuity loss
SIGNIFICANCE This study reports prevalence data combined independently for accommodative dysfunction, convergence insufficiency, visual field loss, and visual acuity loss in patients with traumatic brain injury in the absence of eye injury. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence rates of accommodative dysfunction, convergence insufficiency, visual field loss, and visual acuity loss in TBI patients without concomitant eye injury. DATA SOURCES The data sources used in this study were PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS Publications reporting the prevalence of diagnosed accommodative dysfunction, convergence insufficiency, visual field loss, or visual acuity loss to the level of legal blindness in TBI patients of any age were included. Univariate metaregression analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to account for statistical heterogeneity. RESULTS Twenty-two eligible publications were identified across the four visual conditions. Random-effects models yielded combined prevalence estimates: accommodative dysfunction (42.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31.3 to 54.7), convergence insufficiency (36.3%; 95% CI, 28.2 to 44.9%), visual field loss (18.2%; 95% CI, 10.6 to 27.1%), and visual acuity loss (0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0 to 1.1%). Metaregression and subgroup analyses revealed that visual field loss was significantly more prevalent in moderate to severe (39.8%; 95% CI, 29.8 to 50.3%) compared with mild TBI (6.6%; 95% CI, 0 to 19.5%). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS This study demonstrates that accommodative dysfunction, convergence insufficiency, and visual field loss are common sequelae of TBI. Prospective longitudinal research with rigorous and uniform methodology is needed to better understand short- and long-term effects of TBI on the vision system.
The following license files are associated with this item:
- Creative Commons