A randomized controlled trial of the effects of working memory training in methadone maintenance patients

Thumbnail Image

Files

nihms719825.pdf (453.13 KB)
NIHMS719825-supplement-01.pdf (20.65 KB)

Links to Files

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0376871615016051?via%3Dihub

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.012
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/18727

Collections

UMBC Psychology Department
UMBC Faculty Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2015-08-24

Type of Work

journal articles postprints
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Rass, O., Schacht, R. L., Buckheit, K., Johnson, M. W., Strain, E. C., & Mintzer, M. Z. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of the effects of working memory training in methadone maintenance patients. Drug and alcohol dependence, 156, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.012

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Subjects

Abstract

Objective Working memory impairment in individuals with chronic opioid dependence can play a major role in cognitive and treatment outcomes. Cognitive training targeting working memory shows promise for improved function in substance use disorders. To date, cognitive training has not been incorporated as an adjunctive treatment for opioid dependence. Methods Methadone maintenance patients were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 28) or active control (n = 28) 25-session computerized training and run in parallel. Cognitive and drug use outcomes were assessed before and after training. Results Participants in the experimental condition showed performance improvements on two of four working memory measures, and both groups improved on a third measure of working memory performance. Less frequent drug use was found in the experimental group than in the control group post-training. In contrast to previous findings with stimulant users, no significant effect of working memory training on delay discounting was found using either hypothetical or real rewards. There were no group differences on working memory outcome measures that were dissimilar from the training tasks, suggesting that another mechanism (e.g., increased distress tolerance) may have driven drug use results. Conclusions Working memory training improves performance on some measures of working memory in methadone maintenance patients, and may impact drug use outcomes. Working memory training shows promise in patients with substance use disorders; however, further research is needed to understand the mechanisms through which performance is improved and drug use outcomes are impacted.