Beyond being human: The (in)accessibility consequences of modeling VAPAs after human-human conversation

Thumbnail Image

Files

MukkathRoy_et_al_Poster.pdf (256.1 KB)

Links to Files

https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/103342

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.21900/iconf.2019.103342
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/19901

Collections

UMBC Information Systems Department
UMBC Faculty Collection
UMBC Student Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

Date

2201-03-15

Type of Work

conference papers and proceedings preprints
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Mukkath Roy et al., Beyond being human: The (in)accessibility consequences of modeling VAPAs after human-human conversation, iConference 2019 Proceedings, doi: https://doi.org/10.21900/iconf.2019.103342

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.

Subjects

Abstract

Voice-Activated Personal Assistants (VAPAs) like Amazon's Alexa and Google Assistant have rapidly become pervasive, with users spanning from the youngest young to the oldest old of our society. However, little is known about the nascent VAPA interaction paradigm: what are the fundamental metaphors and guidelines for design, and how do they constrain potential uses and users? This poster begins to answer these questions through a qualitative document review of VAPA design guidelines published by Amazon and Google. Initial results show that human-human conversation is considered the gold standard of interaction. We present an argument that troubles this assumption by adopting a lens of accessible interface design for blind individuals. We advocate VAPA design that moves beyond being human.