Studying Anomalous Discrepancies between MODIS and CALIOP Cloud Observations CyberTraining: Big Data + High-Performance Computing + Atmospheric Sciences
Loading...
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2020
Type of Work
Department
Program
Citation of Original Publication
Abraham, Christine; Norman, Olivia; Shepherd, Erick; Zheng, Jianyu; Zhang, Zhibo; Studying Anomalous Discrepancies between MODIS and CALIOP Cloud Observations CyberTraining: Big Data + High-Performance Computing + Atmospheric Sciences; http://hpcf-files.umbc.edu/research/papers/CT2020Team2.pdf
Rights
This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Abstract
When examining collocated data from the A-Train satellite constellation, there are a
notable number of clouds that CALIOP identifies as transparent but MODIS paradoxically reports as having a high cloud optical thickness (COT), therefore implying that
the cloud is opaque. We refer to these as ”anomalous transparent clouds”. Our team is
investigating two hypotheses in an effort to explain the occurrence of these anomalies.
The first hypothesis is that the anomalies could be MODIS COT retrieval errors due
to the misclassification of high albedo surfaces, such as snow and sea ice, as clouds.
The other hypothesis is that the anomalies could be clouds which are misidentified as
having a high COT due to 3D radiative effects. The former hypothesis was tested by
collocating the single-layer cloud anomalies that were over water with NSIDC AMSRE sea ice observations using a k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) algorithm. We determined
that around 50% of such anomalies occur over areas with high sea ice concentrations
(95-100%). Further research is required to account for the other half of the anomalies
that showed no correlation with high albedo surfaces. We have taken preliminary steps
toward exploring whether the cloud 3D radiative effects hypothesis might explain the
remaining anomalies.