Resisting the Linguistic Hierarchy: Heretical Language and the Rise of Middle English
Loading...
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2020-01-20
Type of Work
Department
English
Program
Texts, Technologies, and Literature
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
Distribution Rights granted to UMBC by the author.
This item may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. It is made available by UMBC for non-commercial research and education. For permission to publish or reproduce, please see http://aok.lib.umbc.edu/specoll/repro.php or contact Special Collections at speccoll(at)umbc.edu
This item may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. It is made available by UMBC for non-commercial research and education. For permission to publish or reproduce, please see http://aok.lib.umbc.edu/specoll/repro.php or contact Special Collections at speccoll(at)umbc.edu
Subjects
Abstract
In the 14th and 15th centuries, English went from a vernacular language to one used in literary and religious contexts. As a vernacular, English was the language of the lower and middle classes, and Latin was the language of religion and academia. The Lollards were early Christian reformers that argued for vernacular translations of the Bible as a class issue of access to religion. This theses explores the impact and interaction Lollards had on England'slinguistic landscape. Early Middle English authors such as Geoffrey Chaucer, William Langland, and the Gawain-poet made linguistic choices that reflect Lollard influence in their writings. The Catholic church responded to the use of the vernacular by limiting English teaching on religion and English translations of the Bible in order to maintain their linguistic power, and this led to the heresy trials of the 15th century, but failed to halt the increasing use of English.