The relationship of science identity, science self-efficacy, and psychological sense of community to STEM graduate school entry among Meyerhoff Scholars
Loading...
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
2021-01-01
Type of Work
Department
Psychology
Program
Psychology
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
This item may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. It is made available by UMBC for non-commercial research and education. For permission to publish or reproduce, please see http://aok.lib.umbc.edu/specoll/repro.php or contact Special Collections at speccoll(at)umbc.edu
Distribution Rights granted to UMBC by the author.
Access limited to the UMBC community. Item may possibly be obtained via Interlibrary Loan thorugh a local library, pending author/copyright holder's permission.
Distribution Rights granted to UMBC by the author.
Access limited to the UMBC community. Item may possibly be obtained via Interlibrary Loan thorugh a local library, pending author/copyright holder's permission.
Abstract
Over the course of the last few decades, there has been a push to diversify the field of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) through the recruitment of underrepresented minorities (URM) to pursue undergraduate and graduate degrees in STEM. A body of research has demonstrated that graduates of the Meyerhoff Scholars Program (MSP), a multi-component, predominantly URM STEM intervention at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, are more likely to pursue STEM graduate study. However, the latent mechanisms of influence for the MSP and similar interventions warrant further study. To address the need for understanding these pathways of influence, the current study investigated the relation of science identity, science self-efficacy, and psychological sense of community with STEM graduate program entry, including mediational relations, and the potential moderation effect of gender on significant mediational relationships. Results demonstrated that, while there was some support for psychological sense of community being an important precursor to STEM graduate pursuit, science identity was the strongest predictor of STEM doctoral entry. Additionally, there was no support for gender as a moderator of significant mediational relations. Study implications, limitations, and recommendations for future research are discussed.