• Login
    View Item 
    •   Maryland Shared Open Access Repository Home
    • Hood College
    • Hood College Student Works
    • View Item
    •   Maryland Shared Open Access Repository Home
    • Hood College
    • Hood College Student Works
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    All in All, it was Just Another Brick in the Wall: Determining the Efficacy and Legality of the Mexican Border Wall

    Thumbnail
    Files
    All in All, it was Just Another Brick in the Wall Determining the Efficacy and Legality of the Mexican Border Wall.pdf (714.3Kb)
    Permanent Link
    http://hdl.handle.net/11603/26838
    Collections
    • Hood College Department of Law and Criminal Justice
    • Hood College Student Works
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Author/Creator
    Jines, Lydia
    Date
    2017-05
    Type of Work
    55 Pages
    Text
    Departmental Honors Paper
    Department
    Hood College Law & Criminal Justice
    Program
    Hood College Departmental Honors
    Abstract
    The debate concerning the efficacy and legality of interstate barriers has experienced a revival as a result of the polarizing campaign rhetoric of Donald Trump. Although the concept of a Mexican Border Wall is not an entirely new concept in American conservative politics, Trump has presented a unique perspective on the necessity and feasibility of the Wall. Early campaign promises of the new administration suggested that “the Wall” would be paid for by the Mexican government. While Mexico’s paying for the Wall is no longer a promise Trump is capable of making, the Administration continues to argue for the construction of the barrier along the border. As a whole, the Trump Administration has faced early opposition to many proposals concerning immigration policy. Continued pressure has been placed on vows to build the Wall, prompting the inclusion of the barrier in this year’s proposed budget. This paper seeks to explore the reality facing any such construction in terms of efficacy and legality of interstate barriers. Historical barriers such as the Great Wall of China and the Berlin Wall can be used to draw conclusions about the likely efficacy of the Mexican Border Wall in achieving its desired ends. The Israeli Separation Barrier in the occupied Palestinian Territory demonstrates the application of newly-developing international legal principles which render interstate barriers illegal. Finally, the historical obstacles facing previous American presidential administrations in the construction of similar barriers along the Mexican border suggest that such a venture is unrealistic and increasingly unnecessary in the face of new methods of unlawful immigration. This paper argues that while undocumented immigrants continue making their way into the country, recent evidence demonstrates that the construction of a wall would be ineffective to stop the influx (Warren & Kerwin 2017: 124). Legally, opinions by international courts suggest that the Mexican Border would be a violation of international law (International Court of Justice 2004)


    Beneficial-Hodson Library
    Hood College
    401 Rosemont Avenue
    Frederick, MD 21701
    www.hood.edu


    If you wish to submit a copyright complaint or withdrawal request, please email mdsoar-help@umd.edu.

     

     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    This CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsSubjectsType

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics


    Beneficial-Hodson Library
    Hood College
    401 Rosemont Avenue
    Frederick, MD 21701
    www.hood.edu


    If you wish to submit a copyright complaint or withdrawal request, please email mdsoar-help@umd.edu.