Towards Explainable and Safe Conversational Agents for Mental Health: A Survey

Thumbnail Image

Files

2304.13191.pdf (2.23 MB)

Links to Files

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13191

Permanent Link

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.13191
 http://hdl.handle.net/11603/28051

Collections

UMBC Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department
UMBC Faculty Collection
UMBC Information Systems Department
UMBC Student Collection

Author/Creator

Author/Creator ORCID

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-2777
 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-2230
 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-8405

Date

2023-04-25

Type of Work

journal articles
preprints
Text

Department

Program

Citation of Original Publication

Rights

This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Subjects

Abstract

Virtual Mental Health Assistants (VMHAs) are seeing continual advancements to support the overburdened global healthcare system that gets 60 million primary care visits, and 6 million Emergency Room (ER) visits annually. These systems are built by clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) researchers for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). At present, the role of VMHAs is to provide emotional support through information, focusing less on developing a reflective conversation with the patient. A more comprehensive, safe and explainable approach is required to build responsible VMHAs to ask follow-up questions or provide a well-informed response. This survey offers a systematic critical review of the existing conversational agents in mental health, followed by new insights into the improvements of VMHAs with contextual knowledge, datasets, and their emerging role in clinical decision support. We also provide new directions toward enriching the user experience of VMHAs with explainability, safety, and wholesome trustworthiness. Finally, we provide evaluation metrics and practical considerations for VMHAs beyond the current literature to build trust between VMHAs and patients in active communications.