Development of an Immunoassay to Detect Insulin in Serum and Buffer Matrices Using ORIGENO® Electrochemiluminescent Technology
Links to Files
Permanent Link
Collections
Author/Creator
Author/Creator ORCID
Date
Type of Work
Department
Hood College Biology
Program
Biomedical and Environmental Science
Citation of Original Publication
Rights
Subjects
Abstract
Immunoassays were developed to detect insulin in serum and buffer matrices
using the ORIGEN® electrochemiluminescent (ECL) technology. A sandwich
immunoassay format utilizing two monoclonal antibodies was used. The assay was able
to detect insulin from several species including rat, human, cow and pig. Sample volume
remained small for the serum and buffer matrix assays at 25 μl and 50 μl respectively.
Assay "turn around" time was approximately four hours for both the insulin in buffer
matrix ECL assay and the insulin in serum matrix ECL assay. The insulin in buffer ECL
assay had an assay range of 0.1 to 12.8 ng/ml with a lowest detectable limit (LDL) of
0.047 ng/ml. The mouse/rat and human insulin in serum matrix ECL assays provided
assay ranges of 0.78 to 50 ng/ml or 0.78 to 200 ng/ml respectively with LDL's of ≤ 0.54
ng/ml. Inter-assay and intra-assay precision for both the serum and buffer ECL assays
averaged percent coefficient of variation (% C.V.'s) below 10 %. In feasibility studies
(Harrington et al. 1997) the ECL assay compared favorably, out performing their
commonly used radioimmunoassay (RIA, Linco, St. Louis MO) and scintillation
proximity assay (SPA®, Amersham International, Arlington Heights IL; Bosworth and
Towers 1989). The ECL assay achieved linear ranges at least 10 fold greater than SPA or
RIA. The ECL assay had a much faster "turn around" time of less than four hours as
compared to RIA and SPA with assay turn around times of 24 hours and 18 hours
respectively. ECL inter-assay precision fell within the range of 2.1 - 5.2 % C.V., which
was comparable to both the RIA and the SPA insulin assays. Functional sensitivity was
slightly better on the ECL assay compared with ELISA and remained slightly better on
the RIA and SPA as compared to the ECL assay.
