A Review of Urban Water Body Challenges and Approaches: (1) Rehabilitation and Remediation
| dc.contributor.author | Hughes, Robert M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dunham, Susie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Maas-Hebner, Kathleen G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yeakley, J. Alan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schreck, Carl | |
| dc.contributor.author | Harte, Michael | |
| dc.contributor.author | Molina, Nancy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shock, Clinton C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kaczynski, Victor W | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schaeffer, Jeff | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-19T16:19:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-19T16:19:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-01-24 | |
| dc.description.abstract | We review how urbanization alters aquatic ecosystems, as well as actions that managers can take to remediate urban waters. Urbanization affects streams by fundamentally altering longitudinal and lateral processes that in turn alter hydrology, habitat, and water chemistry; these effects create physical and chemical stressors that in turn affect the biota. Urban streams often suffer from multiple stressor effects that have collectively been termed an “urban stream syndrome,” in which no single factor dominates degraded conditions. Resource managers have multiple ways of combating the urban stream syndrome. These approaches range from whole-watershed protection to reach-scale habitat rehabilitation, but the prescription must be matched to the scale of the factors that are causing the problem, and results will likely not be immediate because of lengthy recovery times. Although pristine or reference conditions are far from attainable, urban stream rehabilitation is a worthy goal because appropriate actions can provide ecosystem improvements as well as increased ecosystem service benefits for human society. | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The funding for this article was provided by the Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund via the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board to Oregon’s Independent Multidisciplinary Science Team. Bill Stapp provided the philosophy and many of the insights and motivation for writing this article. Prior drafts received constructive reviews by Carlos Alves, George Pess, Les Stanfield, and three anonymous reviewers. | en_US |
| dc.description.uri | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03632415.2013.836500?src=recsys&journalCode=ufsh20 | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 13 pages | en_US |
| dc.genre | journal articles | en_US |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.13016/m23etr-csyv | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Robert M. Hughes, Susie Dunham, Kathleen G. Maas-Hebner, J. Alan Yeakley, Carl Schreck, Michael Harte, Nancy Molina, Clinton C. Shock, Victor W. Kaczynski & Jeff Schaeffer (2014) A Review of Urban Water Body Challenges and Approaches: (1) Rehabilitation and Remediation, Fisheries, 39:1, 18-29, DOI: 10.1080/03632415.2013.836500 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2013.836500 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11603/18934 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
| dc.relation.isAvailableAt | The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | UMBC Geography and Environmental Systems Department Collection | |
| dc.rights | This item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author. | |
| dc.rights | Public Domain Mark 1.0 | * |
| dc.rights | This work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law. | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ | * |
| dc.title | A Review of Urban Water Body Challenges and Approaches: (1) Rehabilitation and Remediation | en_US |
| dc.type | Text | en_US |