Title of Dissertation: Spitfire: Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric

dc.contributor.advisorSaper, Dr. Craig
dc.contributor.authorDeShields, Inte'a A.
dc.contributor.departmentLanguage, Literacy & Culture
dc.contributor.programLanguage Literacy and Culture
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T19:59:49Z
dc.date.available2023-07-31T19:59:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.description.abstractOn March 26, 2014, for the first time in intercollegiate competitive debate history, two African American women won top honors and named champions of the Cross-Examination Debate Associations national tournament. Using this incident, this dissertation explores the press reports published about this historic moment. Through a collection of 19 artifacts, this dissertation demonstrates how American culture emboldens the white gaze to impose a culture of cultural oppression, and intellectual repression of Black thought while victimizing Western culture, toward the erasure of the celebration of Black women. This rhetorical analysis considers the 2014 Cross-Examination Debate Associations final tournament outcome to explore press reports as an exemplary case of how American cultural standardization edifies the white gaze and its rage in reaction to Black rhetoric. Pulling from Whiteness Studies, this dissertation presents a history of intercollegiate competitive debate alongside a history of the development of American culture to frame unmarked whiteness as problematic. Citing this historic moment, this project notes much of the media response to the tournament outcome presented critiques of the debater?s arguments and speech style and focused on the male debaters, toward the erasure the women who were the champions. This project uses exnomination, abstract liberalism, American Africanism, and cooptation to frame the rhetoric of whiteness as rage and demonstrates how this rage acts as a violent terror tactic that passively and aggressively coopted the Debater?s strategic use of the ?n-word? to create symbolic dissention that elevates the Black male debaters while simultaneously silencing and erasing the Black women debaters. It is the goal of this project to demonstrate how whiteness operates in reporting of this historic moment, and to exonerate the women who, through the rhetorical violence of white rage, were virtually erased in the process. Keywords: rhetoric and culture, rhetorical analysis, Africana/Afrocentric Studies, Whiteness Studies
dc.formatapplication:pdf
dc.genredissertation
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2xhpt-dl4z
dc.identifier.other11828
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/28935
dc.languageen
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Language, Literacy & Culture Department Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Theses and Dissertations Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Graduate School Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Student Collection
dc.rightsThis item may be protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. It is made available by UMBC for non-commercial research and education. For permission to publish or reproduce, please see http://aok.lib.umbc.edu/specoll/repro.php or contact Special Collections at speccoll(at)umbc.edu
dc.sourceOriginal File Name: DeShields_umbc_0434D_11828.pdf
dc.subjectAfricana studies
dc.subjectmedia
dc.subjectrhetoric
dc.subjectrhetorical analysis
dc.subjectrhetoric & culture
dc.subjectWhiteness studies
dc.titleTitle of Dissertation: Spitfire: Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric
dc.typeText
dcterms.accessRightsAccess limited to the UMBC community. Item may possibly be obtained via Interlibrary Loan through a local library, pending author/copyright holder's permission.
dcterms.accessRightsAccess limited to the UMBC community. Item may possibly be obtained via Interlibrary Loan thorugh a local library, pending author/copyright holder's permission.

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
DeShields_umbc_0434D_11828.pdf
Size:
1.76 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format