Comparisons between in Situ Anisotropic Reflectance Measurements and Simulations for Vegetation Canopies: Validation and Sensitivity Analysis

dc.contributor.authorCheng, Yen-Ben
dc.contributor.authorCorp, Lawrence A.
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Elizabeth M.
dc.contributor.authorHuemmrich, Karl
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Qingyuan
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Petya Entcheva
dc.contributor.authorParker, Geoffrey
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-12T20:56:20Z
dc.date.available2023-07-12T20:56:20Z
dc.date.issued2009-02-10
dc.descriptionIGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 07-11 July 2008, Boston, MA, USAen_US
dc.description.abstractIn situ directional reflectance observations were taken on trees of three species and were used to validate the Four-Scale Linear Model for AnIsotropic Reflectance (FLAIR). FLAIR-simulated spectra were satisfactory in general, especially for the shaded and shaded/sunlit mixed portions of the canopy but were species dependent. Good agreements with field observations were found when utilizing these simulations to derive band ratio indexes, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI). Sensitivity analysis were performed to investigate the importance of three canopy biophysical parameters, and the leaf to shoot ratio showed the most impact on simulation results. The results in this study showed the potential to simulate directional reflectances with FLAIR on canopies with complicated structure.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4779467en_US
dc.format.extent3 pagesen_US
dc.genreconference papers and proceedingsen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2aigu-bjxu
dc.identifier.citationY. -B. Cheng et al., "Comparisons between in Situ Anisotropic Reflectance Measurements and Simulations for Vegetation Canopies: Validation and Sensitivity Analysis," IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Boston, MA, USA, 2008, pp. III - 790-III - 792, doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779467.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2008.4779467
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/28648
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC GESTAR II
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Faculty Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Geography and Environmental Systems Department
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.en_US
dc.rightsPublic Domain Mark 1.0*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/*
dc.titleComparisons between in Situ Anisotropic Reflectance Measurements and Simulations for Vegetation Canopies: Validation and Sensitivity Analysisen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4148-9108en_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0823-308Xen_US
dcterms.creatorhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0505-4951en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparisons_between_in_Situ_Anisotropic_Reflectance_Measurements_and_Simulations_for_Vegetation_Canopies_Validation_and_Sensitivity_Analysis.pdf
Size:
321.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: