How well has land-use planning worked under different governance regimes? A case study in the Portland, OR-Vancouver, WA metropolitan area, USA

dc.contributor.authorKline, Jeffrey D.
dc.contributor.authorThiers, Paul
dc.contributor.authorOzawa, Connie P.
dc.contributor.authorYeakley, J.Alan
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Sean N.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-19T15:58:12Z
dc.date.available2020-06-19T15:58:12Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-28
dc.description.abstractWe examine land use planning outcomes over a 30-year period in the Portland, OR-Vancouver, WA (USA) metropolitan area. The four-county study region enables comparisons between three Oregon counties subject to Oregon's 1973 Land Use Act (Senate Bill 100) and Clark County, WA which implemented land use planning under Washington's 1990 Growth Management Act. We describe county-level historical land uses from the mid-1970s to the mid-2000s, including low-density residential and urban development, both outside and inside of current urban growth boundaries. We use difference-in-differences models to test whether differences in the proportions of developed land resulting from implementation of urban growth boundaries are statistically significant and whether they vary between Oregon and Washington. Our results suggest that land use planning and urban growth boundaries now mandated both in Oregon and Washington portions of the study area have had a measurable and statistically significant effect in containing development and conserving forest and agricultural lands in the Portland-Vancouver metropolitan area. Our results also suggest, however, that these effects differ across the four study-area counties, likely owing in part to differences in counties’ initial levels of development, distinctly different land use planning histories, and how restrictive their urban growth boundaries were drawn.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPartial funding for this study was provided by the National Science Foundation to the Portland-Vancouver ULTRA-Ex project, with grant numbers 0948983, 0948826, and 0949042. We thank four anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204614001765?via%3Dihub#!en_US
dc.format.extent13 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2bpg2-ffxt
dc.identifier.citationJeffrey D.Kline et al., How well has land-use planning worked under different governance regimes? A case study in the Portland, OR-Vancouver, WA metropolitan area, USA, Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 131, Pages 51-63(2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/18933
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Geography and Environmental Systems Department Collection
dc.rightsThis item is likely protected under Title 17 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Unless on a Creative Commons license, for uses protected by Copyright Law, contact the copyright holder or the author.
dc.rightsPublic Domain Mark 1.0*
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/*
dc.titleHow well has land-use planning worked under different governance regimes? A case study in the Portland, OR-Vancouver, WA metropolitan area, USAen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0169204614001765-main.pdf
Size:
2.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: