Evaluating WRF-GC v2.0 predictions of boundary layer and vertical ozone profiles during the 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign in Houston, Texas

dc.contributor.authorLiu, Xueying
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yuxuan
dc.contributor.authorWasti, Shailaja
dc.contributor.authorLi, Wei
dc.contributor.authorSoleimanian, Ehsan
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, James
dc.contributor.authorGriggs, Travis
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, John T.
dc.contributor.authorRoots, Maurice
dc.contributor.authorTwigg, Laurence
dc.contributor.authorGronoff, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorBerkoff, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorWalter, Paul
dc.contributor.authorEstes, Mark
dc.contributor.authorHair, Johnathan W.
dc.contributor.authorShingler, Taylor
dc.contributor.authorScarino, Amy Jo
dc.contributor.authorFenn, Marta
dc.contributor.authorJudd, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T19:10:09Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T19:10:09Z
dc.date.issued2023-06-01
dc.description.abstractThe Tracking Aerosol Convection Experiment Air Quality (TRACER-AQ) campaign probed Houston air quality with a comprehensive suite of ground-based and airborne remote sensing measurements during the intensive operating period in September 2021. Two post-frontal high-ozone episodes (September 6–11 and 23–26) were recorded during the said period. In this study, we evaluated the simulation of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) height and the vertical ozone profile by a high-resolution (1.33 km) 3-D photochemical model, Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)-driven GEOS-Chem (WRF-GC). We contrasted the model performance between ozone-episode days and non-episode days. The model captures the diurnal variations of the PBL during ozone episodes (R = 0.72–0.77; normal mean bias (NMB) = 3 %–22 %) and non-episode days (R = 0.88; NMB = -21 %), compared with the ceilometer at La Porte. Land-water differences in PBL heights are captured better during non-episode days than episode days, compared with the airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar-2 (HSRL-2). During ozone episodes, the simulated land-water differences are 50–60 m (morning), 320–520 m (noon), and 440–560 m (afternoon) in comparison with the observed values of 190 m, 130 m, and 260 m, respectively. During non-episode days, the simulated land-water differences are 140–220 m (morning) and 360–760 m (noon) in comparison with the observed values of 210 m and 420 m, respectively. For vertical ozone distributions, the model was evaluated against vertical profile measurements from the Tropospheric Ozone lidar (TROPOZ), the HSRL-2, and ozonesondes, as well as at the surface from a model 49i ozone analyzer and a site from the Continuous Ambient Monitoring Stations (CAMS) at La Porte. The model underestimates free tropospheric ozone (2–3 km aloft) by 9 %–22 % but overestimates near-ground ozone (< 50 m aloft) by 6 %–39 % during the two ozone episodes. Boundary layer ozone (0.5–1 km aloft) is underestimated by 1 %–11 % during September 8–11 but overestimated by 0 %–7 % during September 23–26. Based on these evaluations, we identified two model limitations: the single-layer PBL representation and free tropospheric ozone underestimation. These limitations have implications for the predictivity of ozone’s vertical mixing and distribution in other models.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) (Grant No. 582-22-31544-019) and by a grant from the Texas Air Quality Research Program (AQRP) (22-008) at The University of Texas at Austin through the Texas Emission Reduction Program (TERP) and the TCEQ. The findings, opinions, and conclusions are the work of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the findings, opinions, or conclusions of the AQRP or the TCEQ.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2023/egusphere-2023-892/en_US
dc.format.extent33 pagesen_US
dc.genrejournal articlesen_US
dc.genrepreprintsen_US
dc.identifierdoi:10.13016/m2fi8y-lffe
dc.identifier.citationLiu, X., Wang, Y., Wasti, S., Li, W., Soleimanian, E., Flynn, J., Griggs, T., Alvarez, S., Sullivan, J. T., Roots, M., Twigg, L., Gronoff, G., Berkoff, T., Walter, P., Estes, M., Hair, J. W., Shingler, T., Scarino, A. J., Fenn, M., and Judd, L.: Evaluating WRF-GC v2.0 predictions of boundary layer and vertical ozone profiles during the 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign in Houston, Texas, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-892, 2023.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-892
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11603/28232
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEGUen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtThe University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Physics Department Collection
dc.relation.ispartofUMBC Student Collection
dc.rightsThis work was written as part of one of the author's official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.en_US
dc.rightsPublic Domain Mark 1.0*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/*
dc.titleEvaluating WRF-GC v2.0 predictions of boundary layer and vertical ozone profiles during the 2021 TRACER-AQ campaign in Houston, Texasen_US
dc.typeTexten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
egusphere-2023-892.pdf
Size:
2.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
egusphere-2023-892-supplement.pdf
Size:
1.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.56 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: